seoba naroda

Be that as it may, let’s recall what happened in Rotherham, England: At least 1,400 children were subjected to brutal sexual exploitation between 1997 and 2013; children as young as 11 were raped by multiple perpetrators, abducted, trafficked to other cities, beaten and intimidated; “doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone, as the official report put it.” There had been three previous inquiries into these goings on that led to nothing. One inquiry team noted a fear among council staff that they’d be labelled “racist” if they pursued the matter. Why? The perpetrators were almost exclusively members of Pakistani gangs and their victims—referred by the perpetrators as “white trash”—were white schoolgirls.

bemty wrote:super je ovo zatvaranje granica, savrseno ce da spreci teroriste iz brisela.

However, the attacks in France have sharpened a fresh political concern: physical security. The plot that unfolded on Parisian streets appears to have been hatched partly in Belgium, and to have involved the shipping of automatic weapons across the frontier by car. As a borderless zone, Schengen depends on the quality of intelligence sharing between national police forces. On this occasion, much seems to have slipped through the cracks.

plachkica wrote:Ja ovo uopšte ne mogu da komentarišem.
Tužna sam, besna, svesna da prave sranje.
A nemoćna.

ostap bender wrote:zene ubijaju u huarezu, siluju po indiji, svestenici pipkaju ali zatvori granice za sirijce.

zizek je u panici vec neko vreme. digao ruke od misljenja po ovom pitanju. nista vise cut the balls.

mene je strah njegove panike zato sto on ima ipak daleko bolji uvid od nas sta se valja iza brega.

Radagast wrote:Inace postavljanje prema ovakvim stvarima je IMHO merilo kvaliteta misli, ne neka uopstena vrcava mudrovanja o marksizmu i Lakanu.

ostap bender wrote:mene je strah njegove panike zato sto on ima ipak daleko bolji uvid od nas sta se valja iza brega.

• [url=https://disqus.com/embed/comments/?base=default&version=535b1faff5d641b82126e27ee837ea19&f=inthesetimes&t_i=18605&t_u=http%3A%2F%2Finthesetimes.com%2Farticle%2F18605%2Fbreaking-the-taboos-in-the-wake-of-paris-attacks-the-left-must-embrace-its&t_e=Slavoj Zizek%3A In the Wake of Paris Attacks the Left Must Embrace Its Radical Western roots&t_d=Slavoj Zizek%3A In the Wake of Paris Attacks the Left Must Embrace Its Radical Western roots&t_t=Slavoj Zizek%3A In the Wake of Paris Attacks the Left Must Embrace Its Radical Western roots&s_o=default#][/url]
  
  

Jonas Kyratzes • an hour ago
Zizek's use of the scene from Malcolm X is emblematic of his approach to the truth in this entire essay.
The scene in which Malcolm rejects the help of a young white girl is taken directly from Malcolm's Autobiography. It is important specifically *because Malcolm regretted it*, because his later experiences convinced him that this kind of attitude was the precise opposite of what was needed to actually win the struggle. In other words, Zizek has related half an anecdote, leaving out the conclusion so that it would appear to support his reactionary agenda.
The rest of the essay is pretty much like that: half-truths mixed with outright nonsense in the service of the most reactionary of politics. The two biggest fabrications are the ones that are simply taken for granted:
1) That refugees, who apparently form an essentialized monoculture, "hate our values."
2) That democracy, freedom, equality, etc. are somehow "Western" values and not something people the world over have fought for.
In this way, Zizek manages to pretend to be an internationalist while affirming the logic of Clash of Civilizations pseudoscience.
Reactionary clowns like Zizek are particularly dangerous because they take elements of the real (such as the inability of identity politics to deal with the situation) and combine them with precisely the sort of propaganda that the system requires.

No Country for Old Man wrote:Имигранти се деле на две велике групе: оне које прихвате друштвене и културне конвенције и стандарде нове средине, и оне који их одбаце, и штавише се видно и вољно дистанцирају од истих.

Radagast wrote:

No Country for Old Man wrote:Имигранти се деле на две велике групе: оне које прихвате друштвене и културне конвенције и стандарде нове средине, и оне који их одбаце, и штавише се видно и вољно дистанцирају од истих.

Mislim da je zapravo najbrojnija treca grupa, ona koja kombinuje konvencije i standarde nove sredine i zemlje porekla (Inglehart ima zanimljiv clanak o muslimanskim imigrantima u Evropi, gde pokazuje da su oni po stavovima najcesce na pola puta izmedju domicilnog stanovnistva i stanovnista zemalja iz kojih poticu).* Cak i oni koji se vidno i voljno distanciraju od nove sredine ne mogu tek tako da odbace tu sredinu i vrate se korenima - kultura iz koje poticu je za njih zauvek izgubljena, zato sto nije staticna i sto se i sama menja, i zato sto je jaz izmedju nje i druge generacije imigranata prevelik. Tako da su oni primorani da iznova izmisljaju svoju tradicionalnu kulturu, koja uglavnom ispadne buckuris sastavljen od idealizovanih predstava tradicije i od elemenata iz nove sredine. Uzgred, na duze staze uticaj izmedju imigranata i vecinskog stanovnistva nije jednosmeran - od kulinarstva i muzike do predstava o nacionalnom identitetu, kultura domacina se takodje menja zahvaljujuci imigrantima.

* I jedna anegdota kao ilustracija: pre sat vremena komsija, Tunizanin, dosao u pratnji jednog drugara da mi ponudi neko jelo sa testom i mesom koje je njegova zena kupila, a pri tom nije videla da je meso u pitanju svinjetina, pa oni kao ne mogu da ga jedu. Morao sam ga odbijem, posto ne jedem meso. A onda su on i drugar otisli u podrum da duvaju.

Radagast wrote:Zvao me je vec prethodno, vise puta, ali je ukapirao da sam ja smoran.