seoba naroda

Ispunjenje zadataka iz plana EU za suočavanje sa izbegličkom krizom je novi uslov Srbije u procesu evrointegracija, piše Danas.
Beogradski list je do ovakvog saznanja došao od diplomatskih izvora zaduženih za pomoć Srbiji u rešavanju problema sa izbeglicama.
“To znači da Srbija, za razliku od prethodnih šest meseci, više neće moći samo da preusmerava izbeglice na granice sa Hrvatskom ili Mađarskom, već će morati da izgradi i obezbedi smeštajne kapacitete za više desetina hiljada izbeglica koji će se duže vreme zadržavati u zemlji“, piše Danas. 

Prema saznanjima beogradskog lista, nije realno očekivati da pripadnici Fronteksa stignu na granicu Srbije i Hrvatske pre februara, jer za organizaciju misije treba nekoliko meseci. Dok do toga ne dođe, registracija će se obavljati kao i do sada. 

Takođe, navodi se da sprovođenje izbeglica na granice sa Hrvatskom i Mađarskom više neće biti moguće, kao i da ispunjenje ovih zadataka postaje formalno očekivanje od zemlje kandidata za članstvo u EU. 

“Dakle, 17 tačaka sa samita u Briselu važi za svih 28 punopravnih članica EU, ali i za kandidate. Zapravo, od Zapadnog Balkana će se očekivati organizovani smeštaj, privremeni ili dugoročni, za oko 100.000 ljudi, od čega realno će biti najviše smešteno u Srbiji“, zaključuju sagovornici Danasa. 

Na osnovu dogovora zemalja članica Šengena, Srbija je obaveštena da će doći do zatvaranja granica Slovenije i Austrije, javio je večeras RTS.
Hrvatska razmatra zatvaranje svoje granice, što je već danas najavila i Makedonija.

Kako navodi RTS, po povratku premijera Aleksandra Vučića sutra iz Bujanovca i Preševa uveče oko 21 sat, biće održana još jedna sednica Biroa za koordinaciju službi bezbednosti, na kojoj će se razmatrati stav Srbije po tom pitanju.

Quote wrote:It is a fact that most of the refugees come from a culture that is incompatible with Western European notions of human rights. Tolerance as a solution (mutual respect of each other’s sensitivities) obviously doesn’t work: fundamentalist Muslims find it impossible to bear our blasphemous images and reckless humor, which we consider a part of our freedoms.

Another taboo we must address concerns norms and rules. It is a fact that most of the refugees come from a culture that is incompatible with Western European notions of human rights. Tolerance as a solution (mutual respect of each other’s sensitivities) obviously doesn’t work: fundamentalist Muslims find it impossible to bear our blasphemous images and reckless humor, which we consider a part of our freedoms. Western liberals, likewise, find it impossible to bear many practices of Muslim culture.In short, things explode when members of a religious community consider the very way of life of another community as blasphemous or injurious, whether or not it constitutes a direct attack on their religion. This is the case when Muslim extremists attack gays and lesbians in the Netherlands and Germany, and it is the case when traditional French citizens view a woman covered by a burka as an attack on their French identity, which is exactly why they find it impossible to remain silent when they encounter a covered woman in their midst.
To curb this propensity, one has to do two things. First, formulate a minimum set of norms obligatory for everyone that includes religious freedom, protection of individual freedom against group pressure, the rights of women, etc.—without fear that such norms will appear “Eurocentric.” Second, within these limits, unconditionally insist on the tolerance of different ways of life. And if norms and communication don’t work, then the force of law should be applied in all its forms.