Poslednji film koji ste (ponovo) gledali

AZ-5 wrote:

William Murderface wrote:1917 - lose. Uvredljivo lose.

 

zapad se prosro da je to idi i smotri iz ww1, ne znam gde je to vido, idi je odlican film.

Unlike WWII, films about WWI tend to be bitter antiwar commentaries. This includes the 1930 “All Quiet on the Western Front, the 1937 “The Grand Illusion,” one of the greatest films ever made, and Stanley Kubrick’s 1957 “Paths of Glory.” Since WWI was such an obviously imperialist affair, it would be difficult to represent it as a heroic defense of freedom—even if the propaganda surrounding the war tended to make the “Huns” a demonic force.
Since, as Alexander Pope put it, fools rush in where angels fear to tread, it was no surprise that Sam Mendes would make a film titled “1917” that, while not nearly an attempt to turn the two British soldiers it features into freedom-fighters, does make their efforts to warn off their comrades from a surprise German trap look like a noble sacrifice.

dr. Labrador Špegelj wrote:Nisam gledao film i verovatno neću, ali imam pomalo problem sa time da na taj rat gledam isključivo kao na imperijalističku ujdurmu. On nije isti za sve narode, postoje agresori i oni koji se brane. To jest, za Srbiju WWI nije dirty little trench war.

bruno sulak wrote:mislim ja ne mislim da su britanci isto sto i nemci i mislim da je super sto su huni dobili po njusci i mislim da je super sto je rat dokrajcio k und k i nemacki rajh. ali ostaje cinjenica da je taj rat u svojoj osnovi bio sudar kolonijalnih sila i carevina.

Spoiler:

bruno sulak wrote:inace scena u kojoj nemacki pilot padne pravo na brite pa ga ovaj izvuce a crevni baron ga zvekne nozom je doslovce komicna.

Летећи Полип wrote:

William Murderface wrote:Razumem, ali zašto ovde?

Realno, zabavnije je kad ti švabo zabije nož u leđa, nego kad sa njim pevaš evergrinove.