Rat u Ukrajini

Mór Thököly wrote:Nesto razmisljam, a i citao sam skoro nesto ne bas tako napisano, ali u tim smeru: sta ako Rusija nekako izgubi rat? To moze biti udarac za Nato, doduse kakvom se nisu nadali. Koji kurac Nato i sve u vezi sa njim da "cuva" Evropu od Rusije ako Rusija nije u stanju da pobedi 1 Ukrajinu.

kondo wrote:ovi se sad zajebavaju

rumbeando wrote:Sutrašnji britanski Telegraf na naslovnici ima da su Francuska i Nemačka naoružavale Rusiju uprkos embargu posle aneksije Krima oružjem u vrednosti od 273 miliona evra.

Criticism increased when it emerged that German firms had used a loophole in an EU embargo on arms exports to Russia, making sales worth €121 million (£107 million) of “dual-use” equipment, including rifles and special protection vehicles, to Moscow.
Berlin defended its use of an ambiguity within the EU’s 2014 arms blockade, insisting that the goods were sold only after the Kremlin guaranteed they were for civilian use, rather than military application.
“If there were indications of any kind of military use, the export licenses were not granted,” a spokesman for the country’s economy ministry added.

Since the start of the war in Ukraine, employees of Prosveshcheniye, Russia’s leading educational publishing house, have been asked to remove mentions of Ukraine and Kyiv from Russian schoolbooks, Mediazona reported.
Editors working at the publishing house told Mediazona that after February 24, they had to change about 15% of texts. “Our goal is to make it seem like Ukraine simply doesn’t exist,” one of its sources said.
Another editor pointed out that mentions of Ukraine are removed depending on the context. “We can mention how we saved Kyiv, but there cannot be any mention of Ukraine’s independence now.”