USA - США - SAD

boomer crook wrote:

Filipenko wrote:Mislim da se precenjuje uticaj na izbore. Glasaci se jednostavno ne opredeljuju po tom kriterijumu za koga ce da glasaju, i do sada je 80+ posto ljudi bilo za abortus (uslovni ili neuslovni), pa opet republikanci nekako namaknu pola birackog tela. Zene koje zive u drzavama u kojima ce abortus biti zabranjen ce u kola pa caskom preko imaginarne granicne crte u prvi planned parenthood u plavoj drzavi da ostave svoje fetuse za klintona i gejca.

mislim da potcenjujes koliko je ovo krucijalno pitanje za ameriku. ovo ce dovesto do anti-trampovske mobilizacije glasaca. nesto sto je trebao da bude kruzing za GOP se upravo pretvorilo u bitku.

boomer crook wrote:

Uncle Baby Billy wrote:@boomer, o protivnicima roe v wade
uf, kako koji. kad u čitavim državama na jugu legalno možeš da obaviš abortus na jednom ili dva mesta, to je de facto malo gore od francuske.

ma pristup zdravstvenoj nezi je jedno. i naravno da je amerika gora od francuske u tom smislu. ja govorim o zakonskim ogranicenjima.

Uncle Baby Billy wrote:

boomer crook wrote:

ma pristup zdravstvenoj nezi je jedno. i naravno da je amerika gora od francuske u tom smislu. ja govorim o zakonskim ogranicenjima.

pa nemoj mi to razdvajat
stanje na terenu dobro ukazuje na namere, ja bih rekao.

Background

Changes to the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 raise the possibility that Roe v. Wade could be severely undermined—or even overturned—essentially leaving the legality of abortion to individual states. A reversal of Roe could establish a legal path for states’ pre-1973 abortion bans, as well as currently unenforced post-1973 bans, to take effect.

Many state lawmakers continue to consider and enact abortion bans that fly in the face of constitutional standards and Roe’s precedent in anticipation of an eventual lawsuit on such a ban coming before a Supreme Court hostile to abortion rights.

Some bans prohibit abortion under all or nearly all circumstances, a tactic widely viewed as an attempt to provoke a legal challenge to Roe. Several of this type of ban that were passed by states have been blocked by court orders and would require further court action to be enforced.

Other bans enacted after Roe are designed to be “triggered” and take effect automatically or by swift state action if Roe is overturned. Several states even have laws declaring the state’s intent to ban abortion to whatever extent is permitted by the U.S. Constitution, making their desire to halt abortion access in the state clear. A few states have amended their constitution to declare that it does not contain any protection for abortion rights or allow public funds to be used for abortion.

Meanwhile, policymakers in some states have approved laws to protect abortion rights without relying on the Roe decision. Most of these policies prohibit the state from interfering with the right to obtain an abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person.

Visit our state legislation tracker for policy activity on all sexual and reproductive health topics.
Highlights

23 states have laws that could be used to restrict the legal status of abortion.
9 states retain their unenforced, pre-Roe abortion bans.
13 states have post-Roe laws to ban all or nearly all abortions that would be triggered if Roe were overturned.
9 states have unconstitutional post-Roe restrictions that are currently blocked by courts but could be brought back into effect with a court order in Roe’s absence.
7 states have laws that express the intent to restrict the right to legal abortion to the maximum extent permitted by the U.S. Supreme Court in the absence of Roe.
4 states have passed a constitutional amendment explicitly declaring that their constitution does not secure or protect the right to abortion or allow use of public funds for abortion.
16 states and the District of Columbia have laws that protect the right to abortion.
4 states and the District of Columbia have codified the right to abortion throughout pregnancy without state interference.
12 states explicitly permit abortion prior to viability or when necessary to protect the life or health of the pregnant person.

lalinea wrote:

boomer crook wrote:

mislim da potcenjujes koliko je ovo krucijalno pitanje za ameriku. ovo ce dovesto do anti-trampovske mobilizacije glasaca. nesto sto je trebao da bude kruzing za GOP se upravo pretvorilo u bitku.

Potcenjuje i koliko ta ideja 'hop u auto pa preko state granice' u praksi ne radi. Da pocnemo od preopterecenosti lekara u granicnim drzavama pa nadalje...