Crna Gora

Del Cap wrote:

Inače, autor je profesor filozofije na Univerzitetu u Novom Sadu.

Erős Pista wrote:Lol, znam coveka. Hohstapler.

boomer crook wrote:hvala, ali zar ne kazu muzicari 'dosegao kresendo'?

There was a language-peeve Op-Ed piece in the NYT yesterday called "A crescendo of errors" , written by a violist who hates the expression "reach a crescendo". In music, a crescendo is a gradual increase, but it's widespread in non-musical contexts to use it to mean "reach a very loud state" or something like that. "But here’s the thing: as God — along with Bach, Beethoven and Mozart — is my witness, you cannot “reach” a crescendo." (Well, of course, as many commenters noted, you can reach a crescendo in the sense of reaching the point where it begins.)
Comments were closed before I saw the piece; it got 144 comments. Many applauded the author, but what struck me was how many didn't, and instead made the point that is so often made here, that languages change, and that peeving by "purists" won't prevent change. That seems heartening.

паће wrote:

boomer crook wrote:hvala, ali zar ne kazu muzicari 'dosegao kresendo'?

А и ја знам доста програмера који не знају енглески, па шта. Не смета много послу, а што некад одвале нешто што нема везе са значењем речи, јебигица.

Bleeding Blitva wrote:

boomer crook wrote:hvala, ali zar ne kazu muzicari 'dosegao kresendo'?

Naravno da može, mogu muzičari kukat koliko god oće, ali desila se polisemija i crescendo nije nužno samo proces, a 'reach a crescendo' je itekako u uporabi.

There was a language-peeve Op-Ed piece in the NYT yesterday called "A crescendo of errors" , written by a violist who hates the expression "reach a crescendo". In music, a crescendo is a gradual increase, but it's widespread in non-musical contexts to use it to mean "reach a very loud state" or something like that. "But here’s the thing: as God — along with Bach, Beethoven and Mozart — is my witness, you cannot “reach” a crescendo." (Well, of course, as many commenters noted, you can reach a crescendo in the sense of reaching the point where it begins.)
Comments were closed before I saw the piece; it got 144 comments. Many applauded the author, but what struck me was how many didn't, and instead made the point that is so often made here, that languages change, and that peeving by "purists" won't prevent change. That seems heartening.

Politikolog Vladimir Pavićević, problem pre vidi u potezima Milojka Spajića, nego u koaliciji Mandića i Kneževića.

“Potezi koje poslednjih dana preduzima Spajić veoma podsećaju na onaj period razočaranja građana u Zdravka Krivokapića i njegovu vladu. To su potezi kojima nas mandatar udaljava od one velike tridesetoavgustovske pobede iz 2020. godine. Otud danas u Crnoj Gori imamo nezadovoljstvo ogromnog broja građana poslednjim najavama o tome kako treba da izgleda sledeća vlada”, mišljenja je on.

Pavićević ukazuje da je Spajić imao priliku da stvori dosta čvršću koaliciju, od ove koja će zavisi od jednog ili dva poslanika.

“Umesto što ide na slabu, lomljivu vladu koja će imati većinu od 1 ili 2 poslanika, Spajić je imao priliku da pripremi vladu čije bi jezgro činili pobednici nad Milom i koja bi bila otvorena i za stranke nacionalnih zajednica. Ovako kako sada stvari stoje Spajić neće daleko dogurati u svojoj političkoj karijeri. Evo imamo i najnoviju vest da koalicija Za budućnost Crne Gore prihvata uslove koje je Spajić postavio kako bi oni ušli u vladu, pa ćemo tek da vidimo kako će sve da se rasplete”, smatra.

Filipenko wrote:Glasacu za stranku koja javno obeca da ce lincovati crnogorske kriminalce, pocev od Svete Marovica pa dokle stignu. potjerat digitalne nomade.