USA - США - SAD

Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:

Filipenko wrote:


Tebi je naravno jasno da Tramp nije na celu nikakve partije? Jeste, ima ogroman uticaj, ali kada on "pogura" nekog kandidata to znaci da taj medju republikancima ima vecinu. Odnosno, hocu da kazem, republikanci kao takvi su sljam, nema potrebe da se izgovaraju na Trampa sto na prajmarizima biraju njegove morone. Niko ih ne tera. Da ne pricamo sto vodjstvo republikanaca uvek ima izbor da se ostro suprotstavi Trampu, umesto da ga bockaju desesovsko-kuloarski.

Imaju opciju da mu se suprostave, lol. Pozdravila te Liz Čejni.

Del Cap wrote:Jedan panel Svetske trgovinske organizacije doneo mišljenje kontra američkih trgovinskih mera u vezi čelika i aluminijuna, Ameri im, u skladu sa vizijom rules based ordera, rekli da se napuše kurca i da neće oni njima određivati šta će da rade

[size=39]

Full statement from @USTRSpox on the WTO’s decision on U.S. Section 232 measures on steel and aluminum. pic.twitter.com/hrJA5CmUx6

— United States Trade Representative (@USTradeRep) December 9, 2022

[/size]

Filipenko wrote:

Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:
Imaju opciju da mu se suprostave, lol. Pozdravila te Liz Čejni.

Kakve veze ima Liz Cejni, duboko nepopularna funjara iz tamo nekog Vajominga koja je lelujala izmedju demokrata i republikanaca i koja je ispusila najstrasnije u prajmarizima. Govorim o rukovodstvu republikanaca i njihovim najpopularnijim politicarima sa tvrdim bazama i jezgrom. Recimo Mic Mekonel je vrlo jasno protiv Trampa, ali je po prirodi republikanska fukara pa nece da ide do kraja. Liz Cejni je zlocinacka cerka zlocinca koja je pokusala da se umili raji laznim principima kojih se sama nije drzala, jer je sa Trampom ionako glasala u 95% situacija.

In a hypothetical contest between the two, Mr. DeSantis beats Mr. Trump, 52% to 38%, among likely GOP primary voters contemplating a race in which the first nomination votes will be cast in just over a year.
The poll found that Mr. DeSantis is both well-known and well-liked among Republicans who say they are likely to vote in a party primary or nominating contest, with 86% viewing the Florida governor favorably, compared with 74% who hold a favorable view of Mr. Trump. Only one in 10 likely GOP primary voters said they didn’t know enough about Mr. DeSantis to venture an opinion of him.
Among all registered voters, Mr. DeSantis is viewed favorably by 43%, compared with 36% for the former president. Favorable views of Mr. Trump were the lowest recorded in Journal polling dating to November 2021 and have been pulled down by a decline in positive feelings among Republicans. Since March, his favorable rating among GOP voters has fallen to 74% from 85%, while the share who view him unfavorably has risen to 23% from 13%.

Летећи Полип wrote:

In a hypothetical contest between the two, Mr. DeSantis beats Mr. Trump, 52% to 38%, among likely GOP primary voters contemplating a race in which the first nomination votes will be cast in just over a year.
The poll found that Mr. DeSantis is both well-known and well-liked among Republicans who say they are likely to vote in a party primary or nominating contest, with 86% viewing the Florida governor favorably, compared with 74% who hold a favorable view of Mr. Trump. Only one in 10 likely GOP primary voters said they didn’t know enough about Mr. DeSantis to venture an opinion of him.
Among all registered voters, Mr. DeSantis is viewed favorably by 43%, compared with 36% for the former president. Favorable views of Mr. Trump were the lowest recorded in Journal polling dating to November 2021 and have been pulled down by a decline in positive feelings among Republicans. Since March, his favorable rating among GOP voters has fallen to 74% from 85%, while the share who view him unfavorably has risen to 23% from 13%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/just-in-desantis-holds-14-point-lead-over-trump-among-gop-voters-in-new-wsj-poll/ar-AA15gAE5

Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:

Die-hard fans of Trump who purchase 45 of these cards (that’s at least $4,455 worth of Trump NFTs) will be gifted a ticket to a dinner with the former president, according to the site. Less die-hard fans will be entered into “The Trump Sweepstakes,” where they can win one of “thousands” of prizes, including a one-hour golf game with Trump, autographed memorabilia, and a group zoom call. 

Sean Hannity Testified He Didn't Believe Trump's Election Fraud Lies 'For 1 Second'
Sean Hannity was apparently willing to promote Donald Trump’s bogus election fraud claims on his Fox News show but unwilling to defend them while under oath.
The New York Times is reporting that when Hannity was deposed earlier this year as a part of a massive defamation lawsuit brought forward by Dominion Voting Systems against the right-wing network, he basically admitted his real thoughts about the 2020 election being stolen.
“I did not believe it for one second,” Hannity testified. (...)
In fact, Dominion lawyers argued in a Delaware courtroom on Wednesday that “not a single Fox witness” had produced anything that supported any of the bogus election fraud claims Trump and his supporters promoted after the 2020 presidential election.
Dominion lawyer Stephen Shackelford told the court that Hannity’s doubts were echoed in depositions with other Fox hosts and executives, including Tucker Carlson, who he said: “tried to squirm out of it at his deposition” when asked about what he really believed.

Tag yourself, we’re the war on MEAT! pic.twitter.com/xQOFBq8727

— The Recount (@therecount) December 24, 2022

The Great Gatsby Curve shows how hard it is for children to overcome their parents' income level. The easiest is for children in countries situated in the left-bottom part of the chart, i.e. low Gini coefficient and low Corak's score. The line in this chart has a positive slope.

The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940

One of the defining features of the “American dream” is the aspiration that children have a higher standard of living than their parents (1). (...)
Using this methodology, we found that rates of absolute upward income mobility in the United States have fallen sharply since 1940. Under the benchmark of copula stability, the fraction of children earning more than their parents fell from 92% in the 1940 birth cohort to 50% in the 1984 birth cohort. (...)
Why have rates of upward income mobility fallen so sharply over the past half century? There have been two important macroeconomic trends that have affected the incomes of children born in the 1980s relative to those born in the 1940s: lower Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates and greater inequality in the distribution of growth (17). (...)
Together, these simulations show that increasing GDP growth without changing the current distribution of growth would have modest effects on rates of absolute mobility. Under the current distribution of GDP, we would need real GDP growth rates above 6% per year to return to the rates of absolute mobility seen in the 1940s. Intuitively, because a large fraction of GDP goes to a small number of high income earners today, higher GDP growth does not substantially increase the number of children who earn more than their parents. Hence, reviving the “American dream” of high rates of absolute mobility would require more broadly shared economic growth rather than just higher GDP growth rates.

Fig. 1 Baseline estimates of absolute mobility by birth cohort.
(A and B) The fraction of children earning more than their parents (“absolute mobility”) by parent income percentile for selected child birth cohorts (A) and on average by child birth cohort (B). Only parents with positive income are included in (A); within this group, parent income percentiles are constructed according to their ranks in the distribution of parents’ incomes within each child cohort. Parents with zero income are included in (B), defining absolute mobility as 100% for that subgroup when computing the mean rate of absolute mobility by cohort. Child income is measured at age 30 in the CPS March supplement as the sum of individual and spousal income, excluding immigrants after 1994. Parent income is measured in the census as the sum of the spouses’ incomes for families in which the highest earner is between ages 25 and 35. Children’s and parents’ incomes are measured in real 2014 dollars using the CPI-U-RS. Absolute mobility is calculated by combining these income distributions with the copula estimated for the 1980 to 1982 cohorts in tax data by (12).