kako zajebati radnika

Zato se sad i radnici „Goše“ bune. Ako 5.000, ili 50.000, a možda i svih 500.000 radnika može da dobija plate a da ih ne zaradi, zašto ne bi moglo i njih 500? I, naravno, zna se ko može da im ih da.

Takav režim zakonito završava u diktaturi.

Blind Lime Pie wrote:Nikad mi neće biti jasno kako ova neoliberalna govna, konkretno Lakićević i Brkić, uspevaju da radničke plate apsolutno izuzmu iz koncepta duga i imovine i pretvore ih u nekakvu apstrakciju koja može ali ne mora da se poštuje. Imaš ugovor, u ugovoru piše da zaposlenom treba da platiš toliko i toliko, dakle dužan si da to uradiš, šta je tu toliko teško da se shvati?

Za Lakićevića ne znam, ali za Brkića zasigurno znam da veruje da se plate ne moraju isplaćivati ako situacija tako nalaže. Maksima "dug mora da se plati" za njega važi samo u odnosu slabijeg prema jačem, bukvalno nikada u odnosu jaćeg prema slabijem.

Blind Lime Pie wrote:Ali ove kurvice koje se klatare za njihovim repom, pišu im hagiografije, žderu njihove mrvice sa stola i truju javni prostor svojim ubogim apologijama lopovluka - pa bre to bih rešavao kao Pol Pot.

Blind Lime Pie wrote:Novi Mijat

http://pescanik.net/paradigma-rtb/

Zato se sad i radnici „Goše“ bune. Ako 5.000, ili 50.000, a možda i svih 500.000 radnika može da dobija plate a da ih ne zaradi, zašto ne bi moglo i njih 500? I, naravno, zna se ko može da im ih da.

Takav režim zakonito završava u diktaturi.

Nikad mi neće biti jasno kako ova neoliberalna govna, konkretno Lakićević i Brkić, uspevaju da radničke plate apsolutno izuzmu iz koncepta duga i imovine i pretvore ih u nekakvu apstrakciju koja može ali ne mora da se poštuje. Imaš ugovor, u ugovoru piše da zaposlenom treba da platiš toliko i toliko, dakle dužan si da to uradiš, šta je tu toliko teško da se shvati?

Za Lakićevića ne znam, ali za Brkića zasigurno znam da veruje da se plate ne moraju isplaćivati ako situacija tako nalaže. Maksima "dug mora da se plati" za njega važi samo u odnosu slabijeg prema jačem, bukvalno nikada u odnosu jaćeg prema slabijem.

What you missed at the GrubHub trial about 1099 independent contractors

TechCrunch
Megan Rose Dickey
TechCrunchSeptember 10, 2017

In a windowless, 15th-floor courtroom in downtown San Francisco last week, GrubHub was defending its 1099 independent contractor employment model for its delivery drivers.

There's no verdict yet, and there probably won't be for at least another week. This trial, Lawson vs. GrubHub, is looking to determine whether or not plaintiff Raef Lawson, an ex-GrubHub driver, was misclassified as an independent contractor while delivering food for GrubHub.

Those who work as 1099 contractors can be their own bosses, meaning they can set their own schedules, and decide when, where and how much they want to work. Being a 1099 contractor can also be a solid, lucrative side-hustle because you could theoretically work for several companies at once. As noted in this trial, Lawson also delivered food for other gig economy startups, including Postmates. For employers, bringing on 1099 contractors means they can avoid paying taxes, overtime pay, benefits and workers' compensation.

Although Lawson only seeks a small, estimated sum of $586.56, the result of the trial could potentially affect the employment models of companies like Uber, Lyft, Postmates, Caviar, DoorDash and many others. On day one, I noticed a member of Uber's employment counsel team watching closely, taking notes about the trial. That makes sense, given Uber has found itself as the defendant in similar lawsuits that have ultimately been settled before needing to go to trial.

Lawson's lawyer, Shannon Liss-Riordan (pictured below), has spent a good chunk of time in this trial focusing on the amount of control she perceived GrubHub to have over Lawson during the time he delivered food for them. She's trying to prove that Lawson's employment met the conditions of the Borello test, which looks at circumstances like whether the work performed is part of the company’s regular business, the skill required, payment method and whether the work is done under supervision of a manager. The purpose of the test is to determine whether a worker is a 1099 contractor or a W-2 employee.

Liss-Riordan has pointed to incentives to keep acceptance rates high, a system where GrubHub employees can track drivers, supposed "ghost orders," a scheduling system that makes it difficult to get desired shifts and priority scheduling -- something GrubHub COO Stan Chia testified he's not familiar with, but something former GrubHub driver care specialist Tj O'Shae and Lawson described in their testimonies.

In his testimony, Lawson spoke about the acceptance rate hustle and the effect of ghost orders.

“I wanted to keep my acceptance rate high and get the hourly rate,” Lawson said. “I also wanted to qualify for the weekly bonus and not get deactivated.”

He further explained that maintaining a high acceptance rate would make him eligible for the hourly rate, which he said at one point was $15 but later went down to $11. A perfect acceptance rate, according to Lawson, meant he and other drivers would be eligible for priority scheduling and qualify for a weekly bonus, which was an extra $2/hour up to 40 hours, he said.

Priority scheduling, if it exists, matters because Los Angeles, where Lawson drove for GrubHub, “was one of the most competitive markets for shifts that we had,” O’Shae said in her testimony. Drivers would describe the process to get shifts as a “mad scramble,” she added.

With these alleged ghost orders affecting the acceptance rate of drivers, Liss-Riordan believes GrubHub used “ghost orders” to keep drivers “on their toes,” she said. By allegedly keeping drivers on their toes, the drivers would in theory be more inclined to accept every order they received.

zastitnik gotama wrote:Otkazni rok je 15 dana,  tokom njega imaš sva prava i obaveze kao i bilo koji zaposleni. Otkazni rok se ne može poklapti sa drugim odsustvom,  odnosno ako ne uzmeš dane odmora koje imaš,  biće ti plaćeni sa poslednjom platom. 


Ovo poslednje ne razumem pitanje :-)

Veletin wrote:

zastitnik gotama wrote:Otkazni rok je 15 dana,  tokom njega imaš sva prava i obaveze kao i bilo koji zaposleni. Otkazni rok se ne može poklapti sa drugim odsustvom,  odnosno ako ne uzmeš dane odmora koje imaš,  biće ti plaćeni sa poslednjom platom. 


Ovo poslednje ne razumem pitanje :-)

Зар се неискоришћени дани одмора не преносе код новог послодавца?

Veletin wrote:Исправно.

Blind Lime Pie wrote:Nego šta. Živnula Srbija zbog tog zakona, evo znam na primeru jedne trafike u kraju, stalno ima oglas za radnike. 

(zadrži radnika mesec dana, izbaci ga bez plate, zaposli novog i tako u krug)