Vučićeva Srbija

Bačka Palanka raspisala tender za sanaciju požara koji je u toku https://t.co/kd00AawH8f

— Radio 021 (@Radio021) July 4, 2024

„Imamo jednu informaciju koja će možda mnoge i da šokira. Informacija jeste ta da će AliExpress da registruje ovde svoje magacine koji će da budu centar za Jugoistočnu Evropu i delivery za Srbiju će biti maksimalno dva dana“, rekao je on u podkastu „Šta posle faksa“.

Sam dolazak AliExpress-a će mnoge male biznise to da uništi, em će biti jeftini, em delivery je dva dana, biće ono opcija broj jedan.

https://bizlife.rs/da-li-ce-aliexpress-stvarno-uskoro-da-otvori-magacine-u-srbiji-sta-bi-to-znacilo-za-nas/

Јанош Винету wrote:Мислим да нема шансе за то. Мишковић је уложио 100 милиона еура у Ананас, има прећутну и мање прећутну протекцију државе тј. Вучића за ту инвестицију која треба да буде српски Амазон.  

Ови би га сахранили.

The European country playing off the US, Russia, China and Europe
Serbia is forging close ties with Donald Trump’s team even as it attempts to pursue a middle course in a multipolar world

A deal to allow US investors to redevelop a 1999 Nato bomb site in Belgrade is seen as evidence of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić’s desire to forge links to a possible future Trump presidency

Alec Russell and Marton Dunai in Belgrade 33 MINUTES AGO


For 25 years, a busy junction at the centre of the Serbian capital of Belgrade has been dominated by the blackened shell of the former Yugoslav Ministry of Defence. It has been deliberately left as it was after Nato bombs destroyed it in 1999 during the Kosovo war.

Yet now this shrine to Serbian nationalism is set to be torn down and redeveloped into a glitzy hotel and apartment complex. The investors are from, of all places, America — Belgrade’s old adversary, which twice in the 1990s led military interventions by Nato to thwart Serbian aggression in the region.

And these are not any old American financiers. Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and former senior adviser, heads Affinity Partners, the Saudi Arabia-backed investment fund behind the deal, and Richard Grenell, a prominent former Trump administration aide who retains close ties to the ex-president, helped to broker it.

The deal is a case study in how a small non-aligned state can prepare for Trump’s possible return to the White House, analysts say. It also reflects a heightened western focus on Serbia at a time when prising it away from its historical soulmate, Russia, has become a priority.

Aleksandar Vučić, Serbia’s president since 2017, insists the deal is a wholly business venture and plays down the idea of a quid pro quo. “I am very proud of it,” he tells the Financial Times. “This will bring more investors and more people to Belgrade. Then we’ll have a Trump hotel, a Ritz-Carlton hotel . . . We’ll have everything very soon. Those people negotiating on behalf of the Americans were very professional. Their demands were not easy.”

But the deal seems also patently political; the counterparty is after all the Serbian state. It sets up Vučić to have a close link to the White House in the event of a victory for his fellow nationalist populist, Trump, in November’s US election.

Grenell, an outspoken not to say combative Trump ally, who has been tipped as a potential secretary of state if the former president wins a second term, first floated the idea of such an investment in Belgrade when he was Trump’s Balkans envoy.

It was linked to a broader vision of encouraging American investment into Serbia to seek to tether it in the west’s sphere of influence and weaken its old relationship with Russia, according to people involved in the deal. Grenell likes to present it as a way of helping the US-Serbia relationship move on from the past, in an echo of post-1945 American investments in Tokyo.

“I believe we have taken significant steps in pulling Serbia away from the influence of Russia and China and closer to the US,” he tells the FT. “I also recognise that more needs to be done and I am committed to doing just that.”

To pre-empt criticism of the deal from the powerful rightwing Serbian nationalist lobby, which is strongly pro-Moscow, the investors have committed to building on the site a memorial to the victims of Nato’s bombing, in consultation with Serbian architects.

Simultaneously, Kushner is planning to invest in a luxury tourism project in nearby Albania to the delight of its prime minister, Edi Rama. “We need super luxury like a desert needs water,” Rama says, adding that Kushner and Grenell made the overture to Albania before then turning to invest in Serbia. The only difference, he adds, is that in Albania it was Kushner, not Grenell, who made the initial approach. “In Serbia for sure Grenell was the introducer, but here no,” Rama says.

In Washington the announcement of the deals raised questions over a possible conflict of interest if Trump does return to office. Grenell and Kushner have rejected this, arguing that they are acting as private citizens. Kushner has said in the event of a second Trump term he would not have a role in the administration.

In Europe, the Belgrade deal is seen as a classic bet-hedging manoeuvre by the 54-year-old Vučić, who has dominated domestic and regional politics for a decade — for three years as Serbia’s prime minister and then seven as president — and likes to play off America and the EU against Russia and China.
“He is a keen player of chess,” says Milan Antonijević, a Serbian lawyer and human rights expert, who portrays Vučić as trying to pursue a middle course that best suits Serbia’s long-term interests in an increasingly multipolar world.

“And he knows we don’t have that many players on the global chessboard.”

Vučić has an actual chessboard with a timer in his library. If he were depicted as a piece, he would probably be a bishop zigzagging across the board. In the FT interview, he presents the current age of global flux as a time rich with potential — although also peril — for Serbia.

Even while working with Trump’s allies — and increasingly closely with the Biden administration, too — Vučić has nurtured a relationship with America’s great-power rival, China, for investment. He has also maintained Serbia’s sentimental link with Moscow, albeit mainly via proxies and while keeping Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, at a distance. Serbian nationalists, a powerful force in domestic politics, see Russia as a Slavic soulmate.

Serbs have a “calculated” love for China, says Srđan Bogosavljević, Serbia’s leading pollster, and an “irrational” love for Russia. Accordingly, Serbia is one of only two European countries — the other is Belarus — not to support sanctions against Russia. As for Beijing, Serbia and Hungary were the only two European countries China’s President Xi Jinping visited in May after his state visit to France. China has invested heavily and often tops Serbian opinion polls as the most popular foreign power.

And yet at the same time, Vučić has fostered ties with France’s President Emmanuel Macron and is pushing to work with the EU to help develop potentially Europe’s largest lithium mine in western Serbia, a multibillion-euro project. Vučić insists his goal is membership of the EU, Serbia’s top trade partner. It has been a candidate for 12 years but made little headway in overcoming the EU’s concerns over its commitment to the rule of law and over the unsettled status of the former province of Kosovo.

“Vučić has a catch-all policy,” says Ivan Vejvoda, a fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna. “One moment you have Xi visiting. Then . . . days later, Zelenska [the first lady of Ukraine] and Dmytro Kuleba [Ukraine’s foreign minister] come. Then he goes to the Russian cultural centre and gives a revisionist speech. And then, two days later, he is with the EU, talking about growth plans.”

Asked if he believes in the EU, Vučić sidesteps the question. “I’m not someone who would defend or attack it,” he says. “When you see people are very ardent in attacking the EU I don’t go there because those people are not rational. But when I see the hysteria about so-called EU values I do the same.”

There is too much EU groupthink, he says. “If you go to [EU] meetings, it’s going to be a big pro-Ukrainian rally. If someone doesn’t say what everyone expects, it’s like they are an intruder . . . No one wants to hear different opinions.”

He also, however, recounts how when the head of state of a new member of the Brics — the group of emerging powers led by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — suggested he join, on the grounds that the west was waning, he turned down the offer. “I told him we are on our EU path.”

For western powers, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine made courting Vučić a priority, amid lingering concern that Moscow could seek to stir up animosities in neighbouring Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, which have restive Serbian minorities.

Western diplomats and regional analysts believe he is tilting to the west. In his FT interview he presents his anti-sanctions stance as stemming from an aversion to sanctions after their imposition against Serbia during the 1990s Balkan wars. He also all but confirms that he has discreetly aided Kyiv by selling ammunition to third parties which ends up with Ukraine’s armed forces.

“Vučić is neither a Russian proxy nor a little Putin, as he is sometimes portrayed,” says Vejvoda. “Do most Serbs love Putin? Yes. Do they love Russia? Yes. But when asked where you want to travel, they all want to go to western Europe.”

Vučić might be best described as a chameleon. He started in politics as an extreme nationalist and while he has tacked to the centre, he still regularly plays the nationalist card to shore up support on the right, most recently hosting a pan-Serb meeting in Belgrade. To his critics, he is little different from Viktor Orbán, the illiberal Hungarian prime minister, a Trump fan who vilifies the EU and Nato’s stance on Ukraine.

“He [Vučić] has corrupted the state,” says Dragan Đilas, founder and leader of the Party of Freedom and Justice, Serbia’s largest opposition party. “The prosecutors, for example, are a disaster, totally politicised. Vučić is not popular in Belgrade but he understands that nationalism is the number one way to stay in power.”

Yet at the same time he has forged a friendship with Alex Soros, the investor and philanthropist who heads the board of the Open Society Foundations founded by his father George — long abhorred by supporters of Orbán and Trump as an agent of pernicious liberalism. If anything Vučić is Orbán-lite, analysts suggest. While Vučić echoes Orbán, “it is not a copycat routine”, says the lawyer Antonijević, who says the media in Serbia for example is less controlled than in Hungary.

The Biden administration has invested time and money in bringing Vučić into the west’s camp, and has backed an ambitious solar power project in Serbia. There is no doubt, however, that Trump would be a more natural partner than Biden. “He believes if Trump wins it will be good for him,” says a European diplomat. “Grenell has been very active in the region in the last four years, on the side of Belgrade.”

When asked how a second Trump term could impact Serbia, Vučić hedges his bets. “I am not as big a leader as many others in Europe that are taking sides,” he says. “My friend Viktor [Orbán], he is 100 per cent on Trump’s side. My friends from Brussels, they are 100 per cent on Biden’s side. I’m not. I’m on the Serbian side waiting for the results.”

But he goes on to recall a visit to Trump’s White House — and to contrast that with perfunctory encounters with Biden. “When I visited the White House it was at a time of big disagreements with Rick Grenell, but he was a very diligent, very dedicated person. We had almost three hours of discussion in a submarine-like room. I cannot say that now I have the same treatment. But I can say I had a good talk with Trump.

“I had good talks with Biden before he became president. After that I met him once, twice at receptions for two minutes, but not substantive talks. If you ask most Serbs, 90 per cent will be on Trump’s side.”
The big question for the region now is how Trump’s re-election might affect the thorny, lingering divisions among Serbia’s closest neighbours.

On the road from the airport leading into Belgrade, large black letters stretch over an overpass: “Kosovo is Serbia.” The other side of the overpass, visible to those leaving the city, reads: “Remember — Kosovo is Serbia.”

The status of Kosovo, the fabled birthplace of the Serbian nation, has been a political sore in the region since 1999 when Nato’s bombing campaign paved the way for the former province to declare independence from Serbia in 2008.

Even if Vučić wanted to call a referendum on Kosovo’s independence, he couldn’t get it passed EU negotiators last year brokered a tentative deal, backed by the Biden administration, under which Belgrade would informally allow Kosovo to integrate into international organisations while Pristina would grant greater autonomy to regions with Serb majorities. But the agreement has never been implemented.

The intensity of negotiations could increase dramatically if Trump is re-elected. Grenell has signalled in private discussions that if he is appointed to a senior role in a possible second Trump term the Balkans would be a priority for him, and that he sees Serbia and the region as a natural ally of America.

When Grenell was Balkans envoy, he pushed hard for a deal over Kosovo, according to diplomats in the region. He cut across the strategies of the EU in arguing for a quick fix, infuriating many European officials and some state department diplomats with his confrontational tone.

He also made clear he had little time for the stance of Albin Kurti, Kosovo’s prime minister. In the past year, EU officials and the Biden administration have also become frustrated with Kurti, accusing him of being uncompromising and undermining hope of a settlement.

Kosovan officials and domestic opponents worry that a second Trump administration would be soft on Vučić. Allies of Grenell respond by pointing to how he has, in the past, put pressure on Vučić to move away from Moscow and pushed him to diversify his energy supply from Russia, which provides most of Serbia’s gas.

For Vučić, an accelerated push for a deal would pose a dilemma. Accepting Kosovo’s independence is a formal condition for Serbia’s integration into the EU. Yet to give in to western pressure and agree to it could be political suicide. “No one has been as popular as Vučić in the last 30 years,” says Bogosavljević, the pollster. “But even with this popularity, even if he wanted to call a referendum on Kosovo’s independence he couldn’t get it passed.”

Pivoting from Kosovo, Vučić has recently whipped up a surge of nationalist sentiment over Bosnia. Yet western diplomats say they believe him when he says his priority is economic development. His main project, which will coincide with the scheduled end of his presidency in 2027, is the Expo, the world fair he hopes will set Serbia on a new economic path. “When I speak about the Expo, I speak about substantive changes of this country,” he says.

In this context, Vučić sees opportunities for investment whoever wins the US election — pointing to real estate projects on the lines of the Kushner/Grenell deal as well as the Belgrade Waterfront, a development on the bank of the River Sava. This was backed by the same Emirati developer, Mohamed Alabbar, who was behind the Durrës Marina in Albania.

For his despairing opponents such talk is cheap. They see Vučić as an untrustworthy Janus-figure. Vučić shrugs off the critique and says that everyone has to know how to change. “You need to learn every single day,” he says. “Only donkeys don’t change their minds.”

Zaštita ustavnosti
RODOLJUB ŠABIĆ
09/07/2024


Jedna od posledica ukidanja naknade za konverziju prava korišćenja zemljišta, iako vredna pažnje, promiče skoro neprimetno – pre nekoliko dana je u RGZ pokrenut postupak za konverziju prava korišćenja zemljišta površine oko 3.330.000 m2 u pravo svojine sa dosadašnjeg vlasnika Republike Srbije u korist kompanije Ziđin.

Kad sam u nedelju na društvenoj mreži X ovo napisao, moj komentar je podržalo zaista mnogo ljudi. Ne slučajno, ova vest ne samo da ilustruje efekte zakona kojim je ukinuta naknada za konverziju prava korišćenja zemljišta u državnoj svojini i pretvaranje u privatnu svojinu već i podseća na bukvalno skandalozan način na koji je on usvojen.

Vlada Srbije je utvrdila predlog tog višestruko kontroverznog zakona (Zakon o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji) prošle godine, nakon fingirane „javne rasprave“ i u vreme pune usmerenosti pažnje javnosti na dva jeziva masakra u Beogradu i u okolini Mladenovca. Nakon što je predlog dostavljen skupštini, organizovano je nekakvo javno slušanje, na brzinu, samo pro forme, tek dan pred početak skupštinske rasprave, kad je bilo jasno da će to destimulisati mnoge zainteresovane da učestvuju. I povrh svega o zakonu je u skupštini vođena objedinjena rasprava skupa sa 30 drugih akata, bez gotovo ikakve međusobne veze. I na kraju je „glasačka mašina“ izglasala zakon.

Usvojen je zakon čiji nesporni neposredni efekat je smanjenje javne imovine. Brojni eksperti ocenili su da se radi o odricanju od prava vrednih više milijardi evra. Čak i sami predlagači zakona procenjivali su vrednost naknade za konverzije na približno 2,5 milijarde evra! Ali oni su za odricanje od naknade nudili brojna „sjajna“ obećanja za budućnost: enorman rast stambene izgradnje, milione novih kvadrata i dugoročni rast javnih prihoda, poput taksi za buduće objekte, poreza na budući promet nekretnina, na dobit preduzeća, na zarade i sl., ali pri tom prećutkujući činjenicu da bi mnogi od tih prihoda mogli biti ostvarivani i da naknada za konverziju nije ukinuta. I bez ikakve garancije da će bajkovita obećanja biti ostvarena.

Javnost je sve do danas ostala uskraćena za iole ozbiljne informacije o obimu zemljišta koje se faktički poklanja i informacije o strukturi i najvećim korisnicima nove beneficije. A to bi bez obzira na to da li informacije vlast ni sama nema, ili ima, ali ih svesno uskraćuje javnosti, dakle bez obzira na to da li je u pitanju neodgovorni diletantizam ili svesno favorizovanja privatnih interesa na štetu javnog moralo da podrazumeva odgovornost – moralnu, političku pa i krivičnu.

Ali vest sa početka teksta ne podseća samo na odgovornost kreatora zakona koji su nekima omogućili enormno bogaćenje na račun građana Srbije već i na to da, mada oni jesu najodgovorniji, nisu i jedini odgovorni.

Jer, to da su sa stanovišta usklađenosti sa elementarnim ustavnim principima iole uređene države, načela jednakosti pred zakonom i načela pravičnosti, neka rešenja ovog zakona ekstremno problematična, bilo je očito od samog početka. Zakonskim rešenjem o ukidanju naknade za konverziju ukinut je važan izvor finansiranja Budžetskog fonda za restituciju ljudima kojima je svojevremeno imovina oduzeta bez naknade i kojima nije vraćena u naturalnom obliku. Pored toga, zakonom je isključeno pravo na povraćaj naknada za konverziju onima koji su ih već platili. A povrh svega, ovakvo zakonsko rešenje je ignorisalo više od decenije star stav samog Ustavnog suda da konverzija javne svojine u privatnu bez naknade nije moguća.

Moglo se pretpostaviti da bi stav Ustavnog suda o ukidanju naknade za konverziju nužno još jednom mogao biti negativan i sprečiti konverziju bez naknade. Polazeći od toga, bilo je najavljeno da će 84 poslanika pokrenuti poseban, hitan postupak za ocenu ustavnosti zakona koji još nije proglašen. Reč je o mogućnosti utvrđenoj odredbom čl. 169 Ustava, koja predviđa da je, na zahtev najmanje jedne trećine narodnih poslanika, Ustavni sud dužan da u roku od osam dana oceni ustavnost zakona koji je izglasan a ukazom još nije proglašen.

Ali onda se desilo nešto, čak i za žalosne prilike u kojima funkcioniše naše „najviše zakonodavno telo“ skoro neverovatno i bukvalno sramno. Sekretar skupštine je naprasno „nestao“ i tako poslanicima uskratio potpisan tekst izglasanog zakona koji im je bio neophodan za pokretanje postupka pred Ustavnim sudom. Ali „nestali“ sekretar je potpisani tekst zakona ipak dostavio predsedniku republike, a ovaj je, bez odlaganja, potpisao ukaz kojim je proglasio zakon.

Time je isključena makar i hipotetička mogućnost pokretanja hitnog postupka za ocenu ustavnosti. A samim tim i obaveza Ustavnog suda da se brzo izjasni o otvorenim pitanjima (ne)ustavnosti. Ali ako je formalno prestala nije i suštinski. Pa ako sudije Ustavnog suda upornim ćutanjem najavljuju da će se na to čekati u nedogled, ne samo da tako povlađuju jednoj apsolutno nedostojnoj politikantskoj operaciji nego i ulogu zaštitnika Ustava menjaju za ulogu saučesnika u njegovom kršenju.

(Ne)ustavni (U)sud: Lični stav Miodraga Jovanovića


Na kraju mitinga koji je ProGlas organizovao 30. decembra 2023. godine, rekao sam ispred Ustavnog suda da, ako se ova institucija do Sretenja ne oglasi po podnetom zahtevu za poništavanjem izbornog postupka zbog nepravilnosti koje su „imale bitan uticaj na izborni rezultat“, Srbija ulazi u otvorenu diktaturu.

Nekome su se te reči mogle učiniti preoštrim ili neutemeljenim.

Međutim, nakon više od pola godine svojevrsne omerte sudija Ustavnog suda, u kom periodu smo svedočili novoj izbornoj farsi, teško je ne oteti se utisku da živimo u ozvaničenom režimu lične vlasti predsednika Republike.

U tom režimu, vladajuća većina u Narodnoj skupštini je puka glasačka mašina koja podiže ruku na zvuk zvonceta, nikad glomaznijom Vladom rukovodi premijer koji se ne pita ni za šta, a na čelu resora su ministri za koje jedva ko od građana da zna.

Posebno opasno obeležje tog režima ogleda se u uzurpaciji pravosuđa zarad vlastodržačkih ciljeva.

Tako se najviši nosioci javnotužilačke funkcije utrkuju u zametanju kriminalnih tragova svakoga bliskog vrhuški vlasti, a pažljivo odabrane sudije se angažuju za naručene presude koje podupiru sistem apsolutne nekažnjivosti i neodgovornosti politički privilegovane kaste.

U tom režimu, posebno mesto zauzima Ustavni sud, institucija koja je istorijski nastala sa idejom da zauzdava kapricioznu političku većinu u demokratiji.

Ne samo da Ustavni sud Srbije ne obavlja tu funkciju, nego se već duže vreme – u ovom poslednjem sastavu, svakako – ponaša kao slepi branilac samovolje predsednika Republike i njemu bliske klike.

Pa tako, kad je bilo potrebno odbraniti odluku da u uslovima pandemije vanredno stanje proglasi predsednik Republike zajedno s predsednicom Vlade i Skupštine, Ustavni sud je našao da je to u skladu s Ustavom, jer Narodna skupština, koja je primarno za to nadležna, nije imala „organizacione mogućnosti“ da se sastane, iako su kafići, restorani i tržni centri najnormalnije radili u tom trenutku.

Ili kad je bilo potrebno zaštiti Sinišu Malog od etikete plagijatora, Ustavni sud je posegnuo za još neverovatnijom vratolomijom – da Univerzitet u Beogradu može da utvrđuje da li je doktorska teza plagirana, ali da nema pravo da licu za koje je utvrđeno da je neetički postupalo uskrati zvanje doktora nauka.

Najzad, u nemalom broju drugih, politički osetljivih slučajeva Ustavni sud je naprosto odlučio da ćuti i pravi se mrtav.

Pa tako nije reagovao ni kada su 2021. godine ekološka udruženja uputila inicijativu za ocenu ustavnosti/zakonitosti Vladine Uredbe iz 2020. o utvrđivanju Prostornog plana područja posebne namene za realizaciju projekta eksploatacije i prerade minerala jadarita „Jadar“, uprkos tome što je taj projekat izazivao ogromno nezadovoljstvo javnosti koje je kulminiralo blokadama saobraćajnica.

Svojim kontinuiranim (ne)delovanjem, Ustavni sud šalje jasnu poruku građanima Srbije, da je naš usud stanje politički celishodne neustavnosti i bespravlja.

Drugim rečima, mera spremnosti Ustavnog suda da se u politički osetljivim stvarima angažuje na zaštiti Ustava i zakona ove zemlje direktno zavisi od toga da li je to politički poželjno i probitačno za predsednika Republike i vladajuću većinu.

Samo u tom kontekstu se može razumeti nagoveštaj da će se Ustavni sud 11. jula izjasniti o neustavnosti/nezakonitosti Vladine Uredbe iz 2022. o prestanku važenja ranije pomenute Uredbe o Prostornom planu „Jadar“, do koje je i došlo usled masovnih protesta građana.

Nagoveštaj izjašnjavanja Ustavnog suda javlja se baš u trenutku vaspostavljene medijske i političke kampanje predsednika Republike i vladajuće većine u prilog eksploatacije litijuma, iako je po donošenju Uredbe iz 2022. godine rečeno da je „stavljena tačka na Rio Tinto u Srbiji.“

Činjenica da Ustavni sud uskraćuje odgovore na jednostavna pitanja medija – da li je sednica zaista zakazana za taj dan, kao i ko i kada je podneo inicijativu za ocenu ustavnosti/zakonitosti Uredbe iz 2022. godine – stvara dodatno uverenje kod građana da je reč o instituciji koja dela daleko od očiju javnosti i po direktnim nalozima vlasti.

Zato nezavisno od toga da li će Ustavni sud 11. jula zaista odlučivati o tom pitanju, građani imaju pravo da se tog dana okupe pred ovom institucijom i zatraže da ona napokon počne da se ponaša kao beskompromisni i nepristrasni branilac Ustava i zakona Srbije, a ne kao servis režima lične vlasti predsednika Republike.

Autor je profesor univerziteta i jedan od inicijatora ProGlasa
https://www.danas.rs/dijalog/licni-stavovi/neustavni-usud-licni-stav-miodraga-jovanovica/

Jučer, 11. jula, nakon višesatnog zadržavanja i ispitivanja našem Nedimu Musiću je izdata negativna bezbjednosna procjena i odbijen mu je ulazak u Srbiju bez ikakvog konkretnog objašnjenja.

Pozivi na mir i zajedništvo su postali nacionalna prijetnja režimima u Srbiji i BiH? pic.twitter.com/cEKALs8rYF

— Karton Revolucija (@kartrevolucija) July 12, 2024

ficfiric wrote:

Jučer, 11. jula, nakon višesatnog zadržavanja i ispitivanja našem Nedimu Musiću je izdata negativna bezbjednosna procjena i odbijen mu je ulazak u Srbiju bez ikakvog konkretnog objašnjenja.

Pozivi na mir i zajedništvo su postali nacionalna prijetnja režimima u Srbiji i BiH? pic.twitter.com/cEKALs8rYF

— Karton Revolucija (@kartrevolucija) July 12, 2024

Policija obara na zemlju i hapsi ženu preko puta Palate Srbije (SIV)! #Beograd #caosvima pic.twitter.com/hjxLNfgvzm

— Jeremija (@4nbgd) July 19, 2024