by Del Cap Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:32 am
Mór Thököly wrote: Del Cap wrote:
Naravno, jer im ne treba to da BM ne važi uopšte, nego da ne važi ponešto onda kad im zatreba.
Ne znam, nisam nasao to ko argumentuje da nije obavezujuce. Mislim, zavedeno je (registered) pri UN, trebalo bi da predstavlja sastavni deo medjunarodnog prava.
Mislim da je to sve složenije od pukog proceduralnog pitanja (npr što nije ratifikovan u skupštinama kao međ. ugovor), tu je pitanje da li su preuzete obaveze "tvrde" ili ne i mora li se postupati protiv kršioca itd.
Kad su se Belorusi žalili 2013. da američke sankcije
prema njima predstavljaju kršenje BM, Ameri su im zvanično odgovorili (deo argumentacije) da BM nije pravno obavezujući akt:
Belarus: Budapest Memorandum
Media Statement by the U.S. Embassy in Minsk
April 12, 2013
Repeated assertions by the government of Belarus that U.S. sanctions violate the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances are unfounded.
Although the Memorandum is not legally binding, we take these political commitments seriously and do not believe any U.S. sanctions, whether imposed because of human rights or non-proliferation concerns, are inconsistent with our commitments to Belarus under the Memorandum or undermine them. Rather, sanctions are aimed at securing the human rights of Belarusians and combating the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and other illicit activities, not at gaining any advantage for the United States.
Home
i pojedinacni slucaj
Ukraine’s Air Force, along with units of the army and territorial defense, destroyed a large Russian military convoy near the city of Bashtanka in Ukraine’s southern Mykolaiv region. 
