Topik za prave levičare

Working-class voters prefer progressive candidates who focus primarily on bread-and-butter economic issues, and who frame those issues in universal terms. This is especially true outside deep-blue parts of the country. Candidates who prioritized bread-and-butter issues (jobs, health care, the economy), and presented them in plainspoken, universalist rhetoric, performed significantly better than those who had other priorities or used other language. This general pattern was even more dramatic in rural and small-town areas, where Democrats have struggled in recent years.

Populist, class-based progressive campaign messaging appeals to working-class voters at least as well as mainstream Democratic messaging. Candidates who named elites as a major cause of America’s problems, invoked anger at the status quo, and celebrated the working class were well received among working-class voters — even when tested against more moderate strains of Democratic rhetoric.

Progressives do not need to surrender questions of social justice to win working-class voters, but certain identity-focused rhetoric is a liability. Potentially Democratic working-class voters did not shy away from progressive candidates or candidates who strongly opposed racism. But candidates who framed that opposition in highly specialized, identity-focused language fared significantly worse than candidates who embraced either populist or mainstream language.

Working-class voters prefer working-class candidates. A candidate’s race or gender is not a liability among potentially Democratic working-class voters. However, a candidate’s upper-class background is a major liability. Class background matters.

Working-class nonvoters are not automatic progressives. We find little evidence that low-propensity voters fail to vote because they don’t see sufficiently progressive views reflected in the political platforms of mainstream candidates.

Blue-collar workers are especially sensitive to candidate messaging — and respond even more acutely to the differences between populist and “woke” language. Primarily manual blue-collar workers, in comparison with primarily white-collar workers, were even more drawn to candidates who stressed bread-and-butter issues, and who avoided activist rhetoric.

The claim that Joe Rogan -- a supporter of Bernie Sanders, an anti-imperialist, a crusader against factory farms, etc. -- is of the "far right" is the kind of stupidity in which liberals specialize: "let's try to expel the most influential media figure and insist he's our enemy." https://t.co/bC6IaR41C6

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 25, 2021

паће wrote:Хапе ез ин длакави грнчар?

Bleeding Blitva wrote:

паће wrote:Хапе ез ин длакави грнчар?

Da, valjda je to lončar

Solus_Rex wrote:

Ispravljati akcenat drugome dozvoljeno je u vrlo malo situacija, na primer na ispitu iz Dijalektologije sa akcentologijom, u svim ostalim prilikama, kao i sad u Slagalici, to je nevaspitana malograđanska svinjarija. RTS, kao i obično, pronađen kao agens reakcionarne ideologije.

— Nevena Bojičić (@NevenaWednesday) December 12, 2021

Solus_Rex wrote:

Ispravljati akcenat drugome dozvoljeno je u vrlo malo situacija, na primer na ispitu iz Dijalektologije sa akcentologijom, u svim ostalim prilikama, kao i sad u Slagalici, to je nevaspitana malograđanska svinjarija. RTS, kao i obično, pronađen kao agens reakcionarne ideologije.

— Nevena Bojičić (@NevenaWednesday) December 12, 2021