Ne zanimaju mene turcinove fore za trenutno razigravanje
Ne, naravno, daj sad da pricamo o Hugenotima, to je tema
Ne zanimaju mene turcinove fore za trenutno razigravanje
Voting by age. Staggering. pic.twitter.com/GsPU3vBY5I
— Douglas Mackinnon (@drmuig) December 14, 2019
zvezda je zivot wrote:to je mapa za izbore 2017. mada poenta uglavnom stoji
KinderLad wrote:zvezda je zivot wrote:to je mapa za izbore 2017. mada poenta uglavnom stoji
Nije, ovo je u stvari iz istrazivanja Septembar 2018. Ali, takodje, ne verujem da je neka razlika. Problem sa ovakvim mapama je sto stranke verujem ne znaju bas najtacnije sta sa njima.
Bluberi wrote:18-24.
"Ordineee!"
— Che Tempo Che Fa (@chetempochefa) December 15, 2019
John Bercow regala a #CTCF la versione italiana del suo "Order!" @fabfazio @lucianinalitti pic.twitter.com/8pKGtZKZ55
Gargantua wrote:konzervativna revolucija
jbg, buckle up
KinderLad wrote:dobro, da.
ne znam, u ideoloskom su "okruzenju" i bice zajebano
KinderLad wrote:Bluberi wrote:18-24.
a to. ne, ovde je u stvari vaznije ovo 25-49
Mr.Pink wrote:doslovno su napravili od brexita I britanije jebeni spot od pink floyda
Летећи Полип wrote:Andurile, tvoj problem s levicom je što nisu liberali, jebi ga.
The breakdown of results for the three Doncaster constituencies shows that it was the Brexit Party which weakened Labour’s vote. Ex-miners clearly had some difficulty in voting Conservative. In all three Doncaster constituencies the vote for the Brexit Party is more or less equal to the votes lost by Labour. In all three cases there is a minor improvement in the Conservative vote.
This tells us that the deciding factor was not the appeal of Boris Johnson, but the desire to reinforce Doncaster’s vote to leave the EU. There is little doubt that if Labour had stuck to upholding the result of the referendum and simultaneously fighting for social and economic justice, the results would be very different