Блиски исток

Gargamel wrote:

Zuper wrote:Gde su to Iranci pokazali takvu agresivnost?

ja nenapisao "agresivnost". pizdarije.

Avganistan - podrška Talibana
Gaza - podrška anti-Hamas islamističkim grupama u Gazi
Jemen - podrška Hutima
Irak - podrška Malikijevoj anti-sunitskoj politici
Sirija - podrška pretvaranju sunitske sirotinje u kurbane

Ointagru Unartan wrote:Umesto da mirno posmatraju kako im se na granici razvija ogranak Islamske drzave, koju finansiraju privatni fondovi iz Saudijske Arabije, oni podrzavaju neprijatelje IS. Bas su agresivni.

Zuper wrote:U Iraku podrzavaju sitske frakcije i bez njih ID bi pregazio veci deo Iraka. Zapad ih je molio da udju. Slicno vazi za Siriju.

Gargamel wrote:Matis je bio glas razuma i u Obaminoj administraciji, kada se zalagao za oštriji stav kontra Iranaca. budalani ga ni tada nisu slušali.

Gargantua wrote:Ovde je pitanje zašto je vašingtonska dvorska politika životno relevantna za ljude na drugom kontinentu, a ne Obamina politika povlačenja iz Iraka, odsečena od konteksta.

Court orders Iran to pay billions to 9/11 victims and families
By Max Greenwood - 05/01/18 08:00 PM EDT


A federal judge on Tuesday ordered Iran to pay billions of dollars in damages to the families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

In a default — and largely symbolic — judgement, U.S. District Judge George Daniels ordered the Islamic Republic and various entities to pay $12.5 million per spouse, $8.5 million per parent, $8.5 million per child and $4.25 million per sibling.

The ruling faults Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the deaths of the more than 1,000 whose families joined the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was first filed in 2004. But it wasn't allowed to proceed until 2016, after Congress passed a measure permitting the families of 9/11 victims to sue state actors for the terror attacks.

That law, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, was initially vetoed by then-President Barack Obama, who argued that it could set a precedent that would open the U.S. up to similar lawsuits. Congress swiftly overrode that veto.

The ruling against Iran is part of a broader case seeking to hold Saudi Arabia responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks. Last month, Daniels rejected a bid by Riyadh to have that lawsuit tossed out.

Despite the ruling, it is almost certain that Iran will not pay the damages. The Islamic Republic never responded to the lawsuit, and there is no feasible way to force Tehran to pay.

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/385769-court-orders-iran-to-pay-billions-to-9-11-victims-and-families

Gargantua wrote:In a default — and largely symbolic — judgement, U.S. District Judge George Daniels ordered the Islamic Republic and various entities to pay $12.5 million per spouse, $8.5 million per parent, $8.5 million per child and $4.25 million per sibling.

Iran's President Rouhani suggests Tehran may stay in #nucleardeal if Trump scraps it on May 12. "Either what we want from JCPOA will be guaranteed by the non-US partners --if US leaves it's a good thing in my opinion.. -- if we don't get what we want then we have our own path." https://t.co/nuQ8LPJJPo

— Golnaz Esfandiari (@GEsfandiari) May 7, 2018

Smart move to position EU3 as enforcers on the US https://t.co/yTd9GROc6s

— Kori Schake (@KoriSchake) May 7, 2018

Or P5-1: the mother of all transatlantic crises. https://t.co/lPYUmLCso3

— François Heisbourg (@FHeisbourg) May 7, 2018

Trump "Committed To Regime Change" In Iran: Giuliani


Speaking to reporters after a Saturday keynote to the Iran Freedom Convention for Democracy and Human Rights in Washington, Giuliani said "We got a president who is tough, who does not listen to the people who are naysayers, and a president who is as committed to regime change as we are."

Trump plans to withdraw from Iran nuclear agreement, AP sources say

Conflicting signals are emerging from Washington over how far President Trump will go in his Tuesday afternoon announcement on the future of the Iran deal – with sources telling the Associated Press that Trump plans to withdraw from the landmark accord.

The New York Times also reported that Trump told French President Emmanuel Macron the U.S. would withdraw. But an administration official told Fox News that Trump did not make those comments to Macron.

If Trump ultimately does pull back, it’s also not clear which sanctions lifted under the deal Trump plans to immediately re-impose. He has several options. A more limited move could leave Trump more room to potentially stay in the deal if other members agree to toughen it.

If he follows through on a sweeping imposition of sanctions, the move threatens to topple the Iran nuclear agreement as a whole – and with it, his predecessor’s signature foreign policy achievement.  

The president began briefing foreign and congressional leaders on his decision ahead of his 2 p.m. announcement.

And he started the day by warning former Secretary of State John Kerry not to meddle in the negotiations.

“John Kerry can’t get over the fact that he had his chance and blew it! Stay away from negotiations John, you are hurting your country!” Trump tweeted early Tuesday.

This was a reference to reports that Kerry was meeting with foreign officials in a bid to salvage the pact. Speaking at a summit Tuesday in Italy, Kerry did not back down, saying the Middle East is “safer with this agreement” and framing this juncture as a choice between peace and war.
...

bruno sulak wrote:ne znam sta je ovde trampov endgame a da nije rat.

KinderLad wrote:

bruno sulak wrote:ne znam sta je ovde trampov endgame a da nije rat.

pa promena rezima. toliko je bilo jasno iz govora: vi ste super, velika civilizacija, imate svetlu buducnost, rezim vas drzi kao taoce.

promena rezima je endgame u iranu, u to niko ne treba da sumnja. na duzi rok, ali to je. bar ovih koji su sada ne samo kod trampa nego uopste cela ta, pre svega, republikanska (pro-Israeli) ekipa