Mala istorijska biblioteka

Svi brojevi Godišnjaka za društvenu istoriju slobodno su dostupni onlajn. https://t.co/HeCQCljH2N #SocialHistory pic.twitter.com/UW45TMS8eM

— UDI (@udiBelgrade) January 25, 2021

ćaća wrote:The Eclectic, Erratic Bibliography on the Extreme Right in Western Europe

Bread and circuses: historical sociology and political pluralism wrote:The phenomenon, known as "euergetism", is one of the most striking features of the ancient world. It can be seen as a form of altruism, civic pride or wealth redistribution, a means of buying honour, prestige or political power, yet one thing is clear: it was long regarded as a duty and privilege of the wealthy to benefit their fellow citizens. To understand why, suggests Professor Veyne, we need to forget about abstract theories and modern economics. Rather, we should examine what really happened before the Christian era in Hellenistic Greece and the Rome of the Republic and the Emperors.

Solus_Rex wrote:
Ima on esej iste tematike sa dosta primera koji su  pridruženi prvom tomu "Istorije privatnog života"; najbolje mu delo međutim još nije prevedeno sa fr. ili eng. na domaće jezike: 

Bread and circuses: historical sociology and political pluralism wrote:The phenomenon, known as "euergetism", is one of the most striking features of the ancient world. It can be seen as a form of altruism, civic pride or wealth redistribution, a means of buying honour, prestige or political power, yet one thing is clear: it was long regarded as a duty and privilege of the wealthy to benefit their fellow citizens. To understand why, suggests Professor Veyne, we need to forget about abstract theories and modern economics. Rather, we should examine what really happened before the Christian era in Hellenistic Greece and the Rome of the Republic and the Emperors.

Ili o rimskoj ekonomiji darodavanja i kupovine charitas-a. 

Solus_Rex wrote:Za slavske zgode će morati da se dreše dve crvene jer je Mediterran iz NS konačno objavio prevod dela koje Fuko držao za najvažniju studiju XX v. i težio da po nameštenju na Kolež de Frans napiše nešto slično. Sa obiljem bizarnih i deprimirajućih premera pokojni Bloh kao da nam namiguje kako će Aca i Danilo vladati predstojećih sto godina.
 

Ajeje Brazorf wrote:Na sajtu izdavača, koliko vidim

https://mediterran.rs/

Was there ever such a thing as Byzantium? Certainly no emperor ever called himself "Byzantine." And while the identities of minorities in the eastern empire are clear--contemporaries speak of Slavs, Bulgarians, Armenians, Jews, and Muslims--that of the ruling majority remains obscured behind a name made up by later generations.

Historical evidence tells us unequivocally that Byzantium's ethnic majority, no less than the ruler of Constantinople, would have identified as Roman. It was an identity so strong in the eastern empire that even the conquering Ottomans would eventually adopt it. But Western scholarship has a long tradition of denying the Romanness of Byzantium. In Romanland, Anthony Kaldellis investigates why and argues that it is time for the Romanness of these so-called Byzantines to be taken seriously.

In the Middle Ages, he explains, people of the eastern empire were labeled "Greeks," and by the nineteenth century they were shorn of their distorted Greekness and became "Byzantine." Only when we understand that the Greek-speaking population of Byzantium was actually Roman will we fully appreciate the nature of Roman ethnic identity. We will also better understand the processes of assimilation that led to the absorption of foreign and minority groups into the dominant ethnic group, the Romans who presided over the vast multiethnic empire of the east.