Fašizam i desni ekstremizam ante portas

disident wrote:Zajebavajte zajebavajte 

btw tema je jako zanimljiva, ali usled njihove opskurnosti i nevidljivosti, prave podatke o neonacistima u srbiji i njihovoj mrezi mogu da imaju samo sluzbe. Nama samo ostaje da citamo preprice desetak tekstova objavljenih u zadnjih dvadesetak godina i nagadjamo  , kad vec nemamo novinara koji bi se infiltirao i pisao iz prve ruke

Kondo wrote:jojogi, jel posećuješ jasakuni hram kad si u tokiju?

yoyogi wrote:Ovde nie dovoljno cut/paste, treba više toga. I više emotikona, da se podvuče značaj.

William Murderface wrote:

yoyogi wrote:Ovde nie dovoljno cut/paste, treba više toga. I više emotikona, da se podvuče značaj.

Yoyogi, ovo je jos jedan primer tvog najblaze receno cudnog ponasanja na forumu. Tvoja je stvar hoces li ti u svoje postove da stavljas linkove, tekstove, itd. Niko te ne tera da to radis ako neces. Ali, da li mozes da prihvatis da drugi to rade, da im ne smeta i da nemaju nista protiv toga? Jel mozes da prestanes da drzis predavanja svakom forumasu koji okaci neki link, tekst, sliku ili video? Na svom forumu radi sta hoces i sprovodi pravila kakva hoces, ali ovde ne mozes to da radis i potpuno je besmisleno da od drugih zahtevas da se pridrzavaju pravila koja si ti sam izmislio.

Evo, da te posle Fice pitam i ja, da li mozes normalno da komuniciras sa drugima (da ne trolujes sve moguce topike pricama iz Japana, da ne proganjas druge, da ne dolazis na topik o serijama samo da bi po hiljaditi put primetio kako ih ne gledas i kako su svi koji ih gledaju glupe domacice) ili da se razilazimo?

William Murderface wrote:vo, da te posle Fice pitam i ja, da li mozes normalno da komuniciras sa drugima (da ne trolujes sve moguce topike pricama iz Japana, da ne proganjas druge, da ne dolazis na topik o serijama samo da bi po hiljaditi put primetio kako ih ne gledas i kako su svi koji ih gledaju glupe domacice) ili da se razilazimo?

ficfiric wrote:ima vec klon nalog

clone of yoyogi wrote:

ficfiric wrote:ima vec klon nalog

Nema  

Once fascists achieve a requisite level of respectability, fascism itself can start to plant roots. At its core, fascism is based on a particular understanding of social Darwinian struggle – hence the title of Hitler’s autobiography, Mein Kampf (My Struggle). And social Darwinism, in turn, is the common bond linking neoliberalism (or economic libertarianism) and fascism. This is why it is no surprise to hear Trump talk constantly of “winning” in business, regularly signaling his disdain for “losers.” Now that he is in the White House, this facile ideology is being translated into a project of national struggle against other countries.
A similar dynamic is also playing out in Europe. In Germany, many of the original members of the neo-fascist Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) previously belonged to the center-right Free Democratic Party. The FDP, more than any other German political party, champions a neoliberal governing ideology, and has presented itself as unabashedly “globalist,” favoring lower taxes and more free trade. Understanding how fascism can emerge from economic libertarianism is essential for comprehending the danger Western democracies face today.
Economic libertarianism – which should not be conflated with democracy – is a philosophy in which individual struggle is valorized, and success is the determinant of individual worth. Fascism, by contrast, is based on group worth as the product of group struggle. Fascism thus replaces individuals with groups as the subject and object of analysis. It is a clearly distinct position from libertarianism. But recent history shows there are problematic assumptions that allow one to slip from one view into the other, without noticing. For example, those who believe they belong to a group with superior work habits and a greater capacity for struggle can derive individual worth through mere membership in, and solidarity with, that group.