Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

    Блиски исток

    Zuper

    Posts : 10694
    Join date : 2016-06-25

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Zuper Wed Oct 09, 2019 10:58 pm

    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Wed Oct 09, 2019 10:59 pm

    Gargantua wrote:
    Bungee jump wrote:

    Vrlo moguc scenario. Umeju oni to. Pomalo lici na Sadama i Kuvajt, u smislu uvaljivanja lokalnog serifa u problem. Svakako, sa drugacijim "izlazom" iz situacije.

    umeli su, možda, pre 30 godina.

    kad nemaš ozbiljnog protivnika i tvoj skill počinje da opada. sad im je trampara predsednik. 

    sic transit gloria mundi.

    Ok, kažem - da je neko drugi. Mada stoji da je najverovatnija opcija opšti haos.
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:03 pm

    Zuper wrote:

    sa twittera
    ideally, you want the President of the United States, the Mayor of Crazytown and the village idiot to be three different people
    Sotir

    Posts : 8696
    Join date : 2016-10-04

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Sotir Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:08 pm

    Турци доле могу да се ангажују колико имају потрошне пешадије. Своју немају, неће бити популарно кући. Могу као и у Африну да употребе оне своје зелене. Међутим њихова употребна вредност је мала, а и нема их толико да могу да окупирају цео курдски део. 
    Зато ово може бити само ограничена акција, неко уваљивање на дужи рок неће моћи да изгурају.

    Уколико би Курди прихватили неку аутономију и одрекли се своје војске (а остала локална полиција), вероватно би и Турци омекшали.

    Курди немају неке шансе за отпор. Без обзира на бројност, мотивацију и стварање војске претходних година, нису довољно опремљени. ПОВР су им увек давали на кашичицу, често их и само амери користили. Да не говоримо о нечем тежем. 

    Нема ко ни да им пошаље, ником у региону не одговара да сече грану на којој седи. 

    Видимо завршетак једне бриљантне америчке политике...
    паће

    Posts : 41717
    Join date : 2012-02-12
    Location : wife privilege

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by паће Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:08 pm

    Штоно реко Џони, "а и то што читају, криве ствари читају"... Леле, замисли савршен злочин: подметнеш Трампу нешто да прочита и гледаш шта ће да се деси. Оно, не можеш да бираш жртву, али хаос бар можеш да темпираш.


    _____
       the more you drink, the W.C.
       И кажем себи у сну, еј бре коњу па ти ни немаш озвучење, имаш оне две кутијице око монитора, видећеш кад се пробудиш...
    Filipenko

    Posts : 22555
    Join date : 2014-12-01

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Filipenko Thu Oct 10, 2019 12:12 am

    Kurdi su mogli da se vrate pod Asada sa sirokom autonomijom, i Erdogan bi bio time zadovoljan. Ovako...

    Jos samo da ovako postupe i sa Albaptarima... Блиски исток - Page 3 2952840586
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Guest Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:34 am

    America Needs Turkey More Than It Needs to Stay in Syria

    Perhaps Washington has finally realized that it can no longer be an effective player in the Middle East without Ankara.

    ...
    One of the biggest sources of discontent between the two “NATO allies” is the Pentagon’s steadfast backing of the Peoples’ Protection Units (YPG), the Syrian branch of Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which is a top national security threat for Turkey. Washington’s preliminary intent to impose CAATSA was met by Turkey’s grave warning that it would retaliate by staging a major unilateral military incursion into Syria’s YPG controlled areas and form a safe zone. In August, in order to prevent Ankara’s crushing of its allies in Syria, Washington sent James Jeffrey, (its special envoy for Syria) to Turkey. Furthermore, at the G20 Osaka Summit, President Donald Trump and President Recep Erdogan agreed to increase the bilateral trade to $75 billion. These actions persuaded Ankara to give up on an incursion in favor of joint patrols, which started in September. However, a disagreement arose over the distance the joint patrols were allowed to enter (Turkey wanted it to be thirty to thirty-five kilometers in depth while the United States insisted on ten kilometers). Erdogan warned that Turkey’s patience was wearing thin and an incursion is impending.
    ...
    Reporter Valerie Insinna noted in her story for the New York Times, that the F-35 is the Defense Department’s most expensive weapons program ever, expected to cost taxpayers more than $1 trillion over its sixty-year lifespan. Despite its gargantuan budget, the F-35 is nowhere near perfect and mired with problems that are affecting its operability. ... These financial, technical, and other political reasons have been creating a difficult time for the F-35 manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, in finding customers it needs to offset the already morbid cost. Earlier this year, Germany dropped the F-35 in favor of all-European Eurofighter Typhoon. Lockheed Martin’s chances in the lucrative European market were further reduced with the rise of joint fighter programs. In June, France, Germany, and Spain unveiled a new generation joint (Dassault and Airbus) fighter program. In July, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Sweden declared their own joint (BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Saab, and Leonardo) fighter program, Tempest. This makes it doubtful whether the United Kingdom, the Level 1 partner, will buy the intended 138 F-35s after it officially committed to buying 48. Therefore, given all these potential market losses, it would be financially unwise to keep Turkey, which committed to buy more than 100 F-35 jets, out of the Joint Fighter Program. ... The Turkish aerospace companies produce more than nine hundred landing gear parts and fuselage-related parts. Praising the efficiency and quality of the Turkish parts suppliers, Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, said that “the F-35 program will likely experience both schedule delays and cost increases if Turkey is pushed out of the program.” Although she added that the Pentagon is still working on ways to ease this issue, she expressed hopes of keeping Turkey in the program.

    Today, Russia is doing a very impressive job of pulling the second-largest member of NATO into its orbit, taking advantage of America’s blunders. When the Pentagon continued to steadfastly support Turkey’s arch-foe in Syria, Putin promptly offered his full support for Turkey’s incursion. When Washington announced that Turkey was to be ejected from the F-35 program, Putin promptly offered Turks an irrefutable deal on Russian SU-35. After Lindsey Graham’s recent overture, Trump reiterated Turkey’s indispensability for the JFS on Tuesday (October 8) saying; “So many people conveniently forget that Turkey is a big trading partner of the United States, in fact, they make the structural steel frame for our F-35 Fighter Jet.” It is a clear sign that without Turkey’s continuous involvement in the Joint Strike Program, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin are going to have a hard time keeping it afloat. 

    Finally, Trump’s decision to pull troops out of Syria and recent signs that Turkey may remain in the F-35 program indicate Washington perhaps has realized that it can no longer be an effective player in the Middle East by further alienating Turkey. With these major roadblocks being gradually removed, there is hope that the Turkish-American relations will rebound.  

    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/middle-east-watch/america-needs-turkey-more-it-needs-stay-syria-86911

    Anonymous
    Guest

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Guest Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:34 am

    America Needs Turkey More Than It Needs to Stay in Syria

    Perhaps Washington has finally realized that it can no longer be an effective player in the Middle East without Ankara.

    ...
    One of the biggest sources of discontent between the two “NATO allies” is the Pentagon’s steadfast backing of the Peoples’ Protection Units (YPG), the Syrian branch of Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which is a top national security threat for Turkey. Washington’s preliminary intent to impose CAATSA was met by Turkey’s grave warning that it would retaliate by staging a major unilateral military incursion into Syria’s YPG controlled areas and form a safe zone. In August, in order to prevent Ankara’s crushing of its allies in Syria, Washington sent James Jeffrey, (its special envoy for Syria) to Turkey. Furthermore, at the G20 Osaka Summit, President Donald Trump and President Recep Erdogan agreed to increase the bilateral trade to $75 billion. These actions persuaded Ankara to give up on an incursion in favor of joint patrols, which started in September. However, a disagreement arose over the distance the joint patrols were allowed to enter (Turkey wanted it to be thirty to thirty-five kilometers in depth while the United States insisted on ten kilometers). Erdogan warned that Turkey’s patience was wearing thin and an incursion is impending.
    ...
    Reporter Valerie Insinna noted in her story for the New York Times, that the F-35 is the Defense Department’s most expensive weapons program ever, expected to cost taxpayers more than $1 trillion over its sixty-year lifespan. Despite its gargantuan budget, the F-35 is nowhere near perfect and mired with problems that are affecting its operability. ... These financial, technical, and other political reasons have been creating a difficult time for the F-35 manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, in finding customers it needs to offset the already morbid cost. Earlier this year, Germany dropped the F-35 in favor of all-European Eurofighter Typhoon. Lockheed Martin’s chances in the lucrative European market were further reduced with the rise of joint fighter programs. In June, France, Germany, and Spain unveiled a new generation joint (Dassault and Airbus) fighter program. In July, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Sweden declared their own joint (BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Saab, and Leonardo) fighter program, Tempest. This makes it doubtful whether the United Kingdom, the Level 1 partner, will buy the intended 138 F-35s after it officially committed to buying 48. Therefore, given all these potential market losses, it would be financially unwise to keep Turkey, which committed to buy more than 100 F-35 jets, out of the Joint Fighter Program. ... The Turkish aerospace companies produce more than nine hundred landing gear parts and fuselage-related parts. Praising the efficiency and quality of the Turkish parts suppliers, Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, said that “the F-35 program will likely experience both schedule delays and cost increases if Turkey is pushed out of the program.” Although she added that the Pentagon is still working on ways to ease this issue, she expressed hopes of keeping Turkey in the program.

    Today, Russia is doing a very impressive job of pulling the second-largest member of NATO into its orbit, taking advantage of America’s blunders. When the Pentagon continued to steadfastly support Turkey’s arch-foe in Syria, Putin promptly offered his full support for Turkey’s incursion. When Washington announced that Turkey was to be ejected from the F-35 program, Putin promptly offered Turks an irrefutable deal on Russian SU-35. After Lindsey Graham’s recent overture, Trump reiterated Turkey’s indispensability for the JFS on Tuesday (October 8) saying; “So many people conveniently forget that Turkey is a big trading partner of the United States, in fact, they make the structural steel frame for our F-35 Fighter Jet.” It is a clear sign that without Turkey’s continuous involvement in the Joint Strike Program, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin are going to have a hard time keeping it afloat. 

    Finally, Trump’s decision to pull troops out of Syria and recent signs that Turkey may remain in the F-35 program indicate Washington perhaps has realized that it can no longer be an effective player in the Middle East by further alienating Turkey. With these major roadblocks being gradually removed, there is hope that the Turkish-American relations will rebound.  

    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/middle-east-watch/america-needs-turkey-more-it-needs-stay-syria-86911

    Anduril

    Posts : 713
    Join date : 2015-08-30

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Anduril Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:47 am

    Bez obzira na ovo sada, ne treba zaboraviti da Kurdi ne bi imali nista u regionu bez podrske Amera i to jos od devedesetih u Iraku. Nalaze se izmedju cetiri vatre u strateski veoma nezavidnoj poziciji a US ili EU naravno da ne mogu da otkace Tursku u potpunosti.
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:52 am

    Sve to znaju u Washingtonu i Pentagonu odlično i moj neki hunch je da je to 1 od 2 glavna razloga zašto toliko žele promenu režima u Teheranu. Mislim da im Turska postaje "skupa za održavanje"
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:18 pm

    AKCAKALE, Turkey — Shells and rockets landed in several  Turkish border towns on Thursday, killing four civilians, one of them an infant, and wounding 70, in a sharp escalation of the conflict between  Turkey and the Kurdish-led militia that fought alongside American forces in the campaign against Islamist extremists in northern Syria.

    In other news izgleda da su Rusija i US blokirale osudu turskog napada u SB UN
    Erős Pista

    Posts : 82802
    Join date : 2012-06-10

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Erős Pista Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:29 pm

    Lepo.


    _____
    "Oni kroz mene gledaju u vas! Oni kroz njega gledaju u vas! Oni kroz vas gledaju u mene... i u sve nas."

    Dragoslav Bokan, Novi putevi oftalmologije
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:39 pm

    Mislim, ovo mi je izvor, ne znam jel pouzdan

    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:07 pm

    Vladimir Putin has said the Turkish invasion into northern Syria could set free thousands of Isis fighters currently under Kurdish control and their potential escape is “a real threat for us”.
    Speaking at a meeting of leaders of ex-Soviet states in Ashgabat, the capital of Turkmenistan, Putin said he was not sure that Turkey could prevent the escape of prisoners as it presses ahead with an offensive against Kurdish forces in northern Syria.

    “It’s a zone where Isis fighters are concentrated, they are still being held by Kurdish military groups,” said Putin. “Now the Turkish army is going in, the Kurds are leaving these camps, and the Isis fighters inside can just escape. I’m not sure if the Turkish army can take [the fighters] under their control.”
    Zuper

    Posts : 10694
    Join date : 2016-06-25

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Zuper Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:35 pm

    Eto, sto on ne uradi nesto, ima vojsku, ima mocne saveznike...
    Jeste da su Kurdi izdali Asada i Ruse ali opasnost od islamista je veca.
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:57 pm

    Evo saće samo tetki da odnese S-400
    Zuper

    Posts : 10694
    Join date : 2016-06-25

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Zuper Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:20 pm

    Vidis kako znas.
    E sada ponovo procitaj to sto si citirao pa razmisli.
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:52 pm

    Ma idi molim te Блиски исток - Page 3 1399639816
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Guest Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:45 pm

    Filipenko

    Posts : 22555
    Join date : 2014-12-01

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Filipenko Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:00 am

    I ako zarate sada USA i Turska, ko će tu zapravo biti promoter transatlantskih vrednosti, da znam koga da podržim?
    disident

    Posts : 15579
    Join date : 2016-03-28

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by disident Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:02 am

    Ja podržavam da bude dugo i nerešeno  Блиски исток - Page 3 2304934895
    A sad me i zanima nastavak tvita, jesu li turci samo gađali il pogodise i nešto


    _____
    Što se ostaloga tiče, smatram da Zapad treba razoriti
    Jedini proleter Burundija
    Pristalica krvne osvete
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:03 am

    Zapretili su im sankcijama  Блиски исток - Page 3 2304934895
    паће

    Posts : 41717
    Join date : 2012-02-12
    Location : wife privilege

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by паће Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:05 am

    Filipenko wrote:I ako zarate sada USA i Turska, ko će tu zapravo biti promoter transatlantskih vrednosti, da znam koga da podržim?

    Пази, треба прво да знаш ко је ту коме род, тј носач атлантских вредности, а онда додаш трансрод, тј трансатлантик... Нешто као што је међуградска музика у односу на градску, тако некако.

    Ако ти ово буде јасно (ни мени), даље је лако.


    _____
       the more you drink, the W.C.
       И кажем себи у сну, еј бре коњу па ти ни немаш озвучење, имаш оне две кутијице око монитора, видећеш кад се пробудиш...
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Guest Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:09 am

    ja radim za američku firmu koja ima fabriku u turskoj  Блиски исток - Page 3 3579118792
    Nektivni Ugnelj

    Posts : 52645
    Join date : 2017-11-16

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Nektivni Ugnelj Sat Oct 12, 2019 12:13 am

    Блиски исток - Page 3 1233199462

    Pazi, kad god krene neka kriza u svetu, ja samo gledam gde je taj "corner" na kome će kriza skrenuti tako da na kraju mi najebemo (ili neko od nas)

    Блиски исток - Page 3 Empty Re: Блиски исток

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:49 pm