Novak - četnik sa reketom

Значи ипак јесте ФТ1П.
На једном шалтеру Ок, на другом није.

^
ovo jedino ima smisla kao odgovor Čitaku, ne vidim drugi dobar razlog da se ovako oglašava.

Елем, Аустралија је тренутно у узлазном таласу, имају око 45 хиљада случајева дневно, и даље расте.
То је скоро 0,2% становништва дневно. Највише досад. 

Тенисери су вакцинисани (осим тројице са више папира), тестирани и иду и карантин. 
Међутим, у условима оволике раширености вируса, која може бити и већа кад почне АО, врло је могуће да доста играча или чланова тима да закачи вирус.
Ако се то деси, биће још већи циркус.

Ovde objašnjeno

https://www.theage.com.au/national/djokovic-farce-at-airport-the-product-of-a-chain-of-australian-failures-20220106-p59mab.html

Notxor wrote:Ovde objašnjeno

https://www.theage.com.au/national/djokovic-farce-at-airport-the-product-of-a-chain-of-australian-failures-20220106-p59mab.html

Одличан текст. 
Колико год да је болид Новак - ови су успели да испадну још већи кретени.
Поготово што је јасно да су и из Владе директно умешани у случај.

[–]HighestCommonFactor 4377 points 12 hours ago12212& 19 more 
[size=14][size=14]truly the greatest returner of all time[/size][/size]

Novak je lik koji, sa džepom punim mdme, upada u noćni klub usred masovne tuče škaljaraca, kavčana i policijaca u civilu. Pošao čovek u zezanje, pojma nema šta je unutra, to nema veze s njim.

Ali "Ana ga vadi iz hotela", znaci ostaje tamo

Cousin Billy wrote:Novak je lik koji, sa džepom punim mdme, upada u noćni klub usred masovne tuče škaljaraca, kavčana i policijaca u civilu. Pošao čovek u zezanje, pojma nema šta je unutra, to nema veze s njim.

yap

kakav je puls naroda, priča li se u kancelarijama i čekaonicama srpskim o bilo čemu drugom?

Sad sam bio na Cvetkovoj pijaci i mogu ti reći da je napeto kao kobasica. Prodavačica sira telefonira nekome i kaže "Sad bi trebalo sam da se vrati kući i da im pokaže". Krompirdžije pričaju da Australija nije prava zemlja, to je sve robijaš tamo i narkoman.

izdajniče

odložili odluku do pon. kakav shitshow

rupert mardok se umešao znači đok dobija suđenje i onda AO biva cirkus medrano

EXPLAINER ON HOW THIS HAS HAPPENED
Civics 101
Australia is a federation structured much like the US is with state and federal governments that are distinct entities, act independently of each other, and have differing powers and areas of responsibility. They have undertaken differing roles during the pandemic.
Pretty much anything to do with the Open is handled by the government of the state of Victoria, however the Australian federal government is (obviously) in charge of border control and immigration.
The Exemption
Djokovic's exemption was approved by the government of the state of Victoria under a process negotiated between the state and Tennis Australia. The process involved an independent assessment by two separate panels of his evidence that he met the requirements for exemption from Victoria's requirements for vaccination. Exemptions are only granted in six circumstances, one of which is infection with Covid in the last six months.
The exemption that was granted is to the vaccination requirements within the state of Victoria. This applies to entry to venues, including Melbourne Park.
Critically, the approval of the exemption was not:

• Clearance to enter the country
  
  
• An exemption from the requirements of his visa and the entry requirements of the federal government
  
  
• An indication that the Victorian government supported his participation in the Open.
  
  

Border Issues
The Australian federal government requires that all non-citizens entering the country be vaccinated. While the Victorian government through the independent assessment had cleared him for participation, Djokovic still needed to be assessed by the federal government in relation to his entry to the country.
Reports on exactly what happened are scattered, but I've read his entry to the country has been prevented on two points:
* That the visa he has tried to enter on does not allow for vaccine exemptions, and/or

• That the Border Force is disputing the validity of his stated exemption (which is allegedly evidence of prior infection).
  
  

EDIT: from comments made by the Health Minister this morning, the issue was on the latter point.
Australia's current travel restrictions do allow for individual exemptions to the vaccine requirements to be granted to a foreign national whose entry would be in the national interest. This must be supported by the federal government or a state or territory government authority. Border Force reached out to the Victorian state government requesting confirmation of whether it would support Djokovic's entry into the country, and the Victorian government has confirmed it will not support his entry into the country. The federal government has also refused to support an individual exemption and his visa has been rejected.
How can the Victorian government turn around and reject him after approving his exemption?
While I have my own doubts about the independence of the assessment process, the process as outlined by Tennis Australia would mean the exemption was granted as an independent medical decision that the Victorian government (politically) had no hand in making. A process was set up, it was stated to be independent, Djokovic applied for an exemption, his evidence was assessed and he was deemed to meet the exemption requirements.
Whether Djokovic qualified for the exemption is an entirely different question to whether the Victorian government supported his participation in the tournament.
Support for his entry under national interest reasons is effectively the state government sticking their neck out and saying "Djokovic has particular value to our state which warrants us stepping in. We want him here." This is a different ask to an independent medical assessment based on set guidelines.
The Victorian government's position/rhetoric in the lead up to the Open has been pretty clear that they were not happy about the prospect of unvaccinated players/staff participating in the Open. I assume the independent assessment process was set up following heavy pressure from business interests (in particular the broadcaster of the Open). Actively supporting an unvaccinated player would be inconsistent with how the pandemic has been handled for the past two years. For reference, Melbourne underwent one of the longest cumulative lockdowns in the world.
Djokovic's... general aura around the vaccine issue, coupled with the controversy surrounding his demands during the 2021 Open, makes supporting him a massive political bomb for both the federal government and the state government. I guess the state government was hoping the independent panel would allow them to sidestep the issue, however the visa issues meant a decision had to be made.
This still seems like a clusterfuck?
It's like he got a doctors note from doctors in Michigan and then tried to enter the US with the doctors note. The US government says to Michigan "I'm not cool with this, are you cool with this?" and Michigan is like "nah fam we hate the guy." and the US government deports him.

https://www.reddit.com/r/tennis/comments/rwx0y0/comment/hreo3lh/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

https://nova.rs/kultura/miljenko-jergovic-novak-djokovic/