Liberalizam

Gargantua wrote:https://youtu.be/faFrYhwt1Js?t=2242

evo deo odgovora ovde.

revolucija 1989. je bila drugačija jer nije zatrla svoje neprijatelje, optirala je više da ih preveri i da ih, izmenjene, uključi u sistem. dobra posledica takvog mekanog pristupa je da - u liberalnoj demokratiji -  kada se gubi ne gubi se mnogo, ali loša vest je da kada se dobija ne dobija se mnogo.

dakle kako stvari da se promene na bolje ako je svaka promena ili premala, prespora, ili nemoguća. a nemoguća je zbog podele vlasti; hoćeš da promeniš ovaj zakon - e ne može jer ustavni sud je rekao ovo; hoćeš da promeniš ovo - e ne može jer je ova nezavisna agencija rekla drugačije. stoga je populaciji -
koja neće da živi u iluziji dobrog života - ponuđeno da svoje živote poboljša tako što će više vlasti dati političarima, i tu su se iliberalni snašli, uspeli su da tako postave temu.

The Specter of Liberal Internationalism



Daniel Bessner
They present themselves as a policy vanguard. But think tanks like Brookings have become startlingly backward-looking and incapable of charting a new path for the United States in the twenty-first century.

This is where unfortunately the vulgarizers of Fukuyama terribly misled the young Western generation. Having had no direct experience of attractiveness and importance of nationalism, Fascism, populism, or Communism (the Orwell of “Homage to Catalonia” is never mentioned but the Orwell of the “Animal Farm” is known by all) they imagined that no rational human being could ever entertain such views.  The imagined that such beliefs had to be imposed from without—by  the use of extravagant force. So, they believed (in part because it also economically suited them as many of them came of age in the last decade of the 20^th century), that the foreordained teleological march toward the system about which their parents and grandparents entertained serious doubts, could no longer be forestalled. When the march deviated from the planned course, they panicked. But they should not. They should look back at history: historia magistra vitae est.

Can Liberalism Save Itself?

by Jan-Werner Müller on 13 April 2018
The causes and consequences of what is often described as “the rise of populism” are matters of deep dispute. But if there is one thing everyone can agree on, it is that populism is primarily an … Read More