Tribute to Batman

Ne, ta je podela odavno među nama i Holivud je samo vešto (zlo)upotrebljava. U pitanju je drevna mitologija Robina Huda, priprostog čoveka sa sela, koji će u naše ime oteti zlato od ekonomskih i političkih elita iz grada.

Robin Hood, previously known as Robin of Locksley, was the Lord of Locksley and the Earl of Huntington. He was seen as a hero across Nottinghamshire for giving up his own titles to save the peasants of Locksley and across Nottinghamshire. Often seen by his men as thoughtful and brave, he is also known for being arrogant, naive, and for risking other people's lives for his own glory. Robin fought for King Richard in Acre, Israel, during the Third Crusade with his manservant Much whom Robin made a free man after his return from the Holy Land. Robin, after his return, lost his lands, house and title and was Outlawed, becoming the people of Nottinghamshire's only hope

Kinder Lad wrote:

William Murderface wrote:Vote DJB!

+1

DJB mu dodje kao neka farsa petooktobarske koalicije, mister bean Istok Pavlović varijanta iste

Podrška Bregzitu bila je najviša u ruralnim oblastima Engleske, a ruralna Francuska je ta koja pruža podršku Marin le Pen. Čak i u Nemačkoj, gde ne postoji (tolika) dominacija jednog glavnog grada, najveće protivljenje migrantima je u ruralnim zonama.

I once asked Danny Dorling why, when I was at school, geography was about the shapes of rivers, but now all the best-known geographers seem to be Marxists. He said it’s because when you look at a map and see that the people on one side of some line are rich and healthy and long-lived and the people on the other side are poor and sick and die young, you start to wonder why, and that turns you towards deep-causal explanations, which then lead in the direction of Marxism. Travelling around England, I’ve often had cause to remember that remark. We’re used to political analysis based on class, not least because Britain’s political system is arranged around two political parties whose fundamental orientations are around class. What strikes you if you travel to different parts of the country, though, is that the primary reality of modern Britain is not so much class as geography. Geography is destiny. And for much of the country, not a happy destiny.
To be born in many places in Britain is to suffer an irreversible lifelong defeat – a truncation of opportunity, of education, of access to power, of life expectancy. The people who grow up in these places come from a cultural background which equipped them for reasonably well-paid manual labour, un- and semi- and skilled. Children left school as soon as they could and went to work in the same industries that had employed their parents. The academically able kids used to go to grammar school and be educated into the middle class. All that has now gone, the jobs and the grammar schools, and the vista instead is a landscape where there is often work – there are pockets of unemployment, but in general there’s no shortage of jobs and the labour force participation rate is the highest it has ever been, a full 15 points higher than in the US – but it’s unsatisfying, insecure and low-paid. This new work doesn’t do what the old work did: it doesn’t offer a sense of identity or community or self-worth. The word ‘precarious’ has as its underlying sense ‘depending on the favour of another person’. Somebody can take away the things you have whenever they feel like it. The precariat, as the new class is called, might not know the etymology, but it doesn’t need to: the reality is all too familiar.

Kondo wrote:pomozite mi, kada seljak postaje seljan i obrnuto?

uskok i ajduk wrote:

паће wrote:Сељанин си ако живиш на селу, грађанин ако живиш у граду, номад ако живиш на путу

А ако живиш у граду, а радиш на селу?