Ћина-Средње Краљевство

Breaking News： Tsinghua University has begun to shout slogans collectively against Chinese communist party tyranny : “We need democracy,we need rule of law, we need freedom of expression”!
pic.twitter.com/I8uD5u96t0

— Inty (@__Inty__) November 27, 2022

Students from the elite school Tsinghua University protested with Friedmann equation. I have no idea what this equation means, but it does not matter.
It's the pronunciation: it's similar to "free的man" (free man)—a spectacular and creative way to express, with intelligence. pic.twitter.com/m5zomeTRPF

— Nathan Law 羅冠聰 (@nathanlawkc) November 27, 2022

CNN：现在是中国非凡的历史性时刻
。抗议活动在全国各地爆发——从北京到各地精英大学，到其他主要城市，甚至偏远地区。听到人们高呼习近平下台，共产党下台。
pic.twitter.com/oeNv2lhgav

— Inty (@__Inty__) November 27, 2022

Cao pointed his finger at a female student and threatened: “Do you dare to tell me your name?”

She shouted out her name fearlessly. And many other students shouted their names one by one too. pic.twitter.com/8emwSrORk0

— Franka Lu (@FrankaLu) November 26, 2022

During the day, a man holding up a piece of paper written with “You know what I want to say” in front of the shopping mall in #Shanghai. He was later taken away by the police.#China pic.twitter.com/1vYvClModf

— Franka Lu (@FrankaLu) November 26, 2022

My God, this woman in Wuzhen, Zhejiang. https://t.co/ySCNHKRmk6

— Dr. Leta Hong Fincher 洪理达 (@LetaHong) November 27, 2022

Pay attention to all the young women on the front lines of China's protests, being the first to take action. Their discontent has been mounting for many years prior to this moment.
Eg. this lone woman holding white paper at Tsinghua University, then joined by more young women, then a huge crowd (follow the thread).

清华 刚刚
女生举白纸被包围#白纸行动 #A4纸革命 pic.twitter.com/gs9WyPNWkT

— 维尼大帝 (@realEmperorPooh) November 27, 2022

Women have borne the brunt of a likely severe increase in domestic violence under China’s zero-covid lockdowns. As I write in my book Betraying Big Brother, the Communist Party is unlikely to ever enforce the anti-domestic violence law because keeping the patriarchal family structure intact — even when the woman’s life is in danger — is central to political stability and Communist Party survival. By extension, violence against women is an inherent part of China’s patriarchal authoritarianism.
No matter how brutally oppressed a man is by the state, he can always go home and take his anger out on a woman with impunity. No matter how low a man is in society, the woman attaches to him (whether wife or girlfriend) is even lower.
As long as the government continues allowing men to abuse women — in the home, on public transportation, or in the workplace — men are more likely to accept a one-party dictatorship. (P 185)
Growing numbers of women now recognize that they deserve to be treated with dignity and are pushing back against gender discrimination, sexual violence and misogyny. They are seizing control of their own reproduction, threatening the population-planning goals that are central to the Chinese Communist Party’s strategy for surviving beyond the Soviet Union’s seven-decade run. (P. 186)
Even if all the feminist activists in China are arrested or silenced, the forces of resistance they have unleashed will be extremely difficult to stamp out. (P 186, Betraying Big Brother: The Feminist Awakening in China)
Also: any major demographic shift as a result of women choosing to reject marriage and children — or even to rise up collectively against the Communist Party’s oppression — will inevitably reverberate throughout the global economy.
China’s strongman authoritarianism has taken an alarming turn for the worse, allowing Xi Jinping to remain paramount ruler for life. There are many reasons that China’s Communist regime has survived for more than 70 years, in spite of the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe.
But it is impossible to understand the longevity of China’s Communist Party without recognizing the patriarchal underpinnings of its authoritarianism. (P. 4)
The Chinese government aggressively perpetuates traditional gender norms and reduces women to their roles as dutiful wives, mothers and baby breeders in the home, in order to minimize social unrest and give birth to future generations of skilled workers.
And for those who believe Xi will allow political reforms: consider his first major speech as CCP leader in November 2012, in which he explained the Soviet Union’s collapse. (P. 163)
“Gorbachev announced the disbandment of the Soviet Communist Party in a blithe statement…a big party was gone, just like that. Proportionally, the Soviet Communist Party had more members than we do, but nobody was man enough to stand up and resist.” - Xi Jinping, 2012
As @gaoyu200812 wrote: “Nobody was man enough! How vividly this captures Xi Jinping’s anxiety…over the collapse of the Soviet Union!”
As I wrote in Betraying Big Brother, Xi Jinping sees his primary role as stamping out any destabilizing forces that might lead to the Communist Party’s collapse. Xi was declaring that, unlike Gorbachev, he is “man enough” to stand up for the Communist Party.
Xi Jinping has declared that, unlike Gorbachev, he possesses the manly qualities needed to defend China from those “Western hostile forces” seeking to undermine Communist rule. (P. 164, Betraying Big Brother)

Cousin Billy wrote:moj utisak je da se Kina jako zapetljala u kovid. imaju nevakcinisano starije stanovništvo, imunološki nevino stanovništvo, šta god da urade loše je - ako naglo popuste, Bergamo će biti mala beba za ono što ih čeka, ako nastave da zatežu - neće ići, ne može društvo tako da funkcioniše doveka.

Cousin Billy wrote:Isto mi je palo na pamet, a verujem da će rešenje slediti biološke neminovnosti - virus će uraditi isto ono što su uradili svi virusi ikada, proći kroz celokupnu populaciju. Bolnica, vakcina i lekova braćo, a ne policijskih barikada, praćenja i prisluškivanja.

MNE wrote:

Cousin Billy wrote:moj utisak je da se Kina jako zapetljala u kovid. imaju nevakcinisano starije stanovništvo, imunološki nevino stanovništvo, šta god da urade loše je - ako naglo popuste, Bergamo će biti mala beba za ono što ih čeka, ako nastave da zatežu - neće ići, ne može društvo tako da funkcioniše doveka.

jbg play stupid games get stupid prizes

disident wrote:

Cousin Billy wrote:Isto mi je palo na pamet, a verujem da će rešenje slediti biološke neminovnosti - virus će uraditi isto ono što su uradili svi virusi ikada, proći kroz celokupnu populaciju. Bolnica, vakcina i lekova braćo, a ne policijskih barikada, praćenja i prisluškivanja.

Po brojkama iz jula

Imperija zla mrtvih 1,012,833, ukupno obolelih 87,030,788
Kina mrtvih 14,633 , ukupno oblolelih 2,144,566
Reklo bi se da ima razlike izmedju liberalnog kulta smrti i zero covid politike

Cousin Billy wrote:

MNE wrote:


jbg play stupid games get stupid prizes

znaš kako, već neko vreme je jasno da je kombinacija vakcinacije i postepenog otvaranja društva dobar način da se države izbore sa ovim, a da je "otvori sve odjednom, jebo vakcine" recept za satiranje najslabijih elemenata društva, starijih ljudi, hroničnih bolesnika itd. čisto epidemiološki pristup, zatvaraj sve da se spasu životi, u početku mi je izgledao kao bolje rešenje, ali stvarnost je to ubrzo demantovala. na drugom kraju je pristup "otvaraj sve da se spase biznis" koji, zbog epidemioloških posledica, smatram bliskim nacizmu i eugenici.

Kinezi su možda igrali glupe igre ali jesu spasli stanovništvo, za sada, i još uvek imaju fore da izbegnu najgore posledice kovida, za razliku od Brazila, na primer.

Cousin Billy wrote:

MNE wrote:


jbg play stupid games get stupid prizes

znaš kako, već neko vreme je jasno da je kombinacija vakcinacije i postepenog otvaranja društva dobar način da se države izbore sa ovim, a da je "otvori sve odjednom, jebo vakcine" recept za satiranje najslabijih elemenata društva, starijih ljudi, hroničnih bolesnika itd. čisto epidemiološki pristup, zatvaraj sve da se spasu životi, u početku mi je izgledao kao bolje rešenje, ali stvarnost je to ubrzo demantovala. na drugom kraju je pristup "otvaraj sve da se spase biznis" koji, zbog epidemioloških posledica, smatram bliskim nacizmu i eugenici.

Kinezi su možda igrali glupe igre ali jesu spasli stanovništvo, za sada, i još uvek imaju fore da izbegnu najgore posledice kovida, za razliku od Brazila, na primer.

MNE wrote:

Cousin Billy wrote:

znaš kako, već neko vreme je jasno da je kombinacija vakcinacije i postepenog otvaranja društva dobar način da se države izbore sa ovim, a da je "otvori sve odjednom, jebo vakcine" recept za satiranje najslabijih elemenata društva, starijih ljudi, hroničnih bolesnika itd. čisto epidemiološki pristup, zatvaraj sve da se spasu životi, u početku mi je izgledao kao bolje rešenje, ali stvarnost je to ubrzo demantovala. na drugom kraju je pristup "otvaraj sve da se spase biznis" koji, zbog epidemioloških posledica, smatram bliskim nacizmu i eugenici.

Kinezi su možda igrali glupe igre ali jesu spasli stanovništvo, za sada, i još uvek imaju fore da izbegnu najgore posledice kovida, za razliku od Brazila, na primer.

očigledno je najbolji pristup nešto između, s tim što je ovo što smo imali mnogo bliže ovom prvom nego racionalnoj sredini, a što je dovelo do mnogo više umrlih (ne samo od korone), da ne ulazimo u ekonomiju i ostale sitnice

Cousin Billy wrote:Moram da kvalifikujem ovaj bold, verujem da je "zatvaraj sve" pristup u početku pandemije - pre uspostavljanja protokola za lečenje, stvaranja bolničke infrastrukture i razvoja vakcina - spasao nebrojene živote, i kovid i nekovid bolesnika, i da je bio apsolutno neophodan.

Erős Pista wrote:

Cousin Billy wrote:

znaš kako, već neko vreme je jasno da je kombinacija vakcinacije i postepenog otvaranja društva dobar način da se države izbore sa ovim, a da je "otvori sve odjednom, jebo vakcine" recept za satiranje najslabijih elemenata društva, starijih ljudi, hroničnih bolesnika itd. čisto epidemiološki pristup, zatvaraj sve da se spasu životi, u početku mi je izgledao kao bolje rešenje, ali stvarnost je to ubrzo demantovala. na drugom kraju je pristup "otvaraj sve da se spase biznis" koji, zbog epidemioloških posledica, smatram bliskim nacizmu i eugenici.

Kinezi su možda igrali glupe igre ali jesu spasli stanovništvo, za sada, i još uvek imaju fore da izbegnu najgore posledice kovida, za razliku od Brazila, na primer.

Između Kine i Brazila i ja biram Kinu, naravno, ali mere koje oni sprovode moguće su samo u društvu koje bez ikakvih skrupula gazi osnovna prava svojih građana.

Cousin Billy wrote:imaju nevakcinisano starije stanovništvo

As of Monday, 65.8% of that age category had received booster shots, an official told reporters.
That’s up from 40% as of Nov. 11, according to prior disclosures.

Filipenko wrote:Dakle, sad navijamo da se ukinu mere koje su donele jedan od najboljih rezultata po pitanju ucinka u epidemiji kako bi se radnici uterali u fabrike i deblokirala proizvodnja novih iPhone-a?