Virus

Talason wrote:pojednostavljuješ iz nekog razloga

na primer

šta se dešava ukoliko je virus stvarno toliko pristutan i sa njim dolaze u kontakt vakcinisani?

Mór Thököly wrote:Dakle, imunitet za godinu dana. Osim sto ce mnogima koji su primili u feb/martu/apr on isteci do tada

Mór Thököly wrote:




Ma ja ne znam stvarno koja je to fora sa "punoletnima".

The European Commission on Sunday called on EU member states to regularly monitor sewage systems for fresh outbreaks of the coronavirus.

"It is crucial that EU countries set up effective wastewater monitoring systems as soon as possible and ensure the relevant data are immediately made available to health authorities," Environment Commissioner Virginijus Sinkevicius told the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag.

She said they were an "inexpensive, fast and reliable source of information about the spread of the virus and its variants in the population." Large cities and municipalities should analyze at least two samples weekly in what Sinkevicius said was "a proven concept in public health insurance."

Some European countries have already begun monitoring sewage systems and were able to forewarn about worsening outbreaks. Wastewater systems are also used to gain knowledge about the extent of the use of illegal drugs in the population.

In late February 2020, as a new coronavirus spread worldwide, a letter providing advice on avoiding a viral infection was shared and memed heavily. The letter is attributed to pathologist James Robb who described himself as “one of the first molecular virologists in the world to work on coronaviruses.”
...
Stock up now with zinc lozenges. These lozenges have been proven to be effective in blocking coronavirus (and most other viruses) from multiplying in your throat and nasopharynx. Use as directed several times each day when you begin to feel ANY “cold-like” symptoms beginning. It is best to lie down and let the lozenge dissolve in the back of your throat and nasopharynx.

https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038?s=09

Origin of Covid — Following the Clues

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted lives the world over for more than a year. Its death toll will soon reach three million people. Yet the origin of pandemic remains uncertain: the political agendas of governments and scientists have generated thick clouds of obfuscation, which the mainstream press seems helpless to dispel.

In what follows I will sort through the available scientific facts, which hold many clues as to what happened, and provide readers with the evidence to make their own judgments. I will then try to assess the complex issue of blame, which starts with, but extends far beyond, the government of China.

By the end of this article, you may have learned a lot about the molecular biology of viruses. I will try to keep this process as painless as possible. But the science cannot be avoided because for now, and probably for a long time hence, it offers the only sure thread through the maze.

he virus that caused the pandemic is known officially as SARS-CoV-2, but can be called SARS2 for short. As many people know, there are two main theories about its origin. One is that it jumped naturally from wildlife to people. The other is that the virus was under study in a lab, from which it escaped. It matters a great deal which is the case if we hope to prevent a second such occurrence.

I’ll describe the two theories, explain why each is plausible, and then ask which provides the better explanation of the available facts. It’s important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. Each depends on a set of reasonable conjectures but so far lacks proof. So I have only clues, not conclusions, to offer. But those clues point in a specific direction. And having inferred that direction, I’m going to delineate some of the strands in this tangled skein of disaster.

...

We recently saw data from India suggesting the Indian variant (B.1.617) is outcompeting the UK variant (B.1.1.7).

Now, evidence from England suggests B.1.617 is indeed more transmissible.

In mid-April, it accounted for 11% of sequenced cases in London, and 4% nationally. https://t.co/N44eY8LHTg

— Dr Zoë Hyde (@DrZoeHyde) May 4, 2021

Just as we can decompose the US #COVID19 epidemic into a B.1.1.7 epidemic and a non-B.1.1.7 epidemic, we can further partition by variants of concern B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1, where it's clear that P.1 has been gaining ground. 1/13https://t.co/vl3l1JT3ZD

— Trevor Bedford (@trvrb) May 3, 2021