Američki izbori 2020.
- Posts : 37657
Join date : 2014-10-27
- Post n°51
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
_____
And Will's father stood up, stuffed his pipe with tobacco, rummaged his pockets for matches, brought out a battered harmonica, a penknife, a cigarette lighter that wouldn't work, and a memo pad he had always meant to write some great thoughts down on but never got around to, and lined up these weapons for a pygmy war that could be lost before it even started
- Guest
- Post n°52
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Solidarnošć
Đuka deaktivirao nalog uživo u jutarnjem programu. Samo neka sekiracija od jutros pic.twitter.com/bc0A71lZ4Y
— Sajam Ludaka (@BoraKonj) January 9, 2021
- Posts : 52531
Join date : 2017-11-16
- Post n°53
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Oce sad na Parler?
Salim se, vratice se na tnjiter u roku od 5 dana, to je ipak Vuciceva "a mene su strijeljali" skola.
Salim se, vratice se na tnjiter u roku od 5 dana, to je ipak Vuciceva "a mene su strijeljali" skola.
- Posts : 37657
Join date : 2014-10-27
- Post n°54
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
super. vec ima dobre posledice ova odluka.
_____
And Will's father stood up, stuffed his pipe with tobacco, rummaged his pockets for matches, brought out a battered harmonica, a penknife, a cigarette lighter that wouldn't work, and a memo pad he had always meant to write some great thoughts down on but never got around to, and lined up these weapons for a pygmy war that could be lost before it even started
- Posts : 7894
Join date : 2019-06-06
- Post n°55
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
izgubio SSSR bar dva rata da meni padaju na pamet, ne da je bitno nego da kazem.
_____
????
- Posts : 37657
Join date : 2014-10-27
- Post n°56
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
pa izgubila kao sto je amerika izgubila vijetnam. mislim neporediva je zastava sssr sa konfederacijskom.
_____
And Will's father stood up, stuffed his pipe with tobacco, rummaged his pockets for matches, brought out a battered harmonica, a penknife, a cigarette lighter that wouldn't work, and a memo pad he had always meant to write some great thoughts down on but never got around to, and lined up these weapons for a pygmy war that could be lost before it even started
- Posts : 7894
Join date : 2019-06-06
- Post n°57
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
istina, glup tekst, glupo poredjenje, bezveze nitpikingujem...
_____
????
- Posts : 8696
Join date : 2016-10-04
- Post n°58
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Содома и гомора, какав другачији да буде.Marius Lăcătuș wrote:a i ovaj metal je vrlo gej
- Posts : 41623
Join date : 2012-02-12
Location : wife privilege
- Post n°59
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Gargamel wrote:
već napisah da verujem da si čitao nešto gde se pominje 96%, i verujem da je u pitanju nešto negativno.
prosto mislim da si tu nešto pobrkao. u nekom velikom gradu su 96% forenzičkih dokaza prosto izmišljeni? mislim... zloupotreba ima, to je sigurno. ali nema logike da je brojka tako visoka.
Логика је у томе да већ годинама иду бар четири серије где су форензичари главни, и да су управо они ти чијем се доказу непобитно верује. А онда их ваљда понело, кад су видели да их нико не дира.
Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:Branko jebala te balkanizacija u dupe kaljavo
Промашио тему. Фали му кључни састојак, сине ква нон балканизација: мешање страних сила у локалну политику.
Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:A u isto vreme na Fox News na Hannity ide naslov “as president Trump calls for calm and unity, Dems want to drag country (which one? gde vam je “the” stoko nepismena?) through another impeachment”.
Можда је мислио на кантри као придев, нпр тзв музику.
_____
cousin for roasting the rakija
И кажем себи у сну, еј бре коњу па ти ни немаш озвучење, имаш оне две кутијице око монитора, видећеш кад се пробудиш...
- Posts : 7775
Join date : 2017-03-14
- Post n°60
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
ako krene da pravi nove naloge hoće li mu twitter banovati IP?Mór Thököly wrote:Oce sad na Parler?
Salim se, vratice se na tnjiter u roku od 5 dana, to je ipak Vuciceva "a mene su strijeljali" skola.
- Posts : 168
Join date : 2020-09-08
- Post n°61
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Vilmos Tehenészfiú wrote:A u isto vreme na Fox News na Hannity ide naslov “as president Trump calls for calm and unity, Dems want to drag country (which one? gde vam je “the” stoko nepismena?) through another impeachment”.
Потпуно очекивано. Мислио сам да ће раније изаћи са том причом. То је био зицер.
По мени глупи и нагли потези великих друштвених мрежа, нису смели тако нагло да секу велике групе, може Трампа али не толико налога. Овако чак и насилни протести добијају неко оправдање јер се гаси право на Први амандман и слободу говора. Требали су другачије да то одраде.
- Posts : 168
Join date : 2020-09-08
- Post n°62
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Janko Suvar wrote:
Oce da ga impicuju da bi ga osudili i da onda ne moze da se kandiduje 2024te.
Inace :
- Spoiler:
То је тачно али они то не могу, немају већину у Сенату до 20. јуанура а где је 2/3 већине која потребан за смену. Плус овим потезима опет сабијају редове Републиканаца.
Демократе ће вероватно после одласка Трампа донети закон или ограничење против Трампа да обавља јавне функције а то ће по мени само гурнути Трампа у још већу популарност јер у Врховном суду не верујем да ће то проћи а то ће доћи до Врховног суда. По мени јако лоши потези демократа у последње време али могуће да грешим, остаје да се види. Можда имају нешто друго против њега мада тешко јер ако му нису ископали током 4 године онда не верујем да имају нешто велико.
Last edited by staret on Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:53 am; edited 1 time in total
- Posts : 168
Join date : 2020-09-08
- Post n°63
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Mór Thököly wrote:Analogija je sumanuta. S druge strane "the Russians did it" politika ce biti stvarna.
Ако хоће Трећи светски рат могу да крену са тиме. Русија се неће исто понашати са демократама на власти као са Трампом. Али сваки велики сукоб, укључујући светске ратове, су кренули из проблема домаће политике и покушаја извоза кризе тако да је све могуће.
Очигледно је да у америчкој политици тренутно рационалност није баш присутна на свим странама.
- Posts : 11763
Join date : 2014-10-27
Location : kraljevski vinogradi
- Post n°64
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
_____
Ha rendelkezésre áll a szükséges pénz, a vége általában jó.
- Posts : 13817
Join date : 2016-02-01
- Post n°65
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
:flag_us:#USA, poll :
— World Elects (@ElectsWorld) January 7, 2021
President Trump approval rating:
Approve : 40 %
Disapprove : 58 %
President-elect Biden approval rating :
Approve : 57 %
Disapprove : 38 %
Ipsos, 05/01/21 pic.twitter.com/9M0PGwfsOc
- Posts : 28265
Join date : 2015-03-20
- Post n°66
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
u celoj ovoj priči zapravo mi je fascinantan utisak koliko je naša služba ovde napredna i dalekomisleća. oni su kao prsten odbrane oko skupštine u junskim nemirima rasporedili likove koji su u javnosti isto ovo kao MAGA sem što rade za muriju. i kad je prava rulja krenula u skupštinu, damnjan knežević, nogo i ostala ekipa ih je masno istrolovala a onda su na scenu stupili batinaši. bedna ameriko i deda bajdene, ako pretekneš do preuzimanja vlasti, gledaj i uči od onih koji znaju.
_____
#FreeFacu
Дакле, волео бих да се ЈСД Партизан угаси, али не и да сви (или било који) гробар умре.
- Posts : 8696
Join date : 2016-10-04
- Post n°67
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Ја то писао на Белорусији.
Вучић контролише већински власт, медије, полицију, војску, навијаче, пола назови опозиције.
Диктатор Лукашенко може само да сања о том нивоу контроле.
Вучић контролише већински власт, медије, полицију, војску, навијаче, пола назови опозиције.
Диктатор Лукашенко може само да сања о том нивоу контроле.
- Guest
- Post n°68
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
ma jok, može samo da sanja da vlada srbima, bio bi duplo bolji diktator od vučića
- Posts : 8696
Join date : 2016-10-04
- Post n°69
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Дајте ми послушне грађане да вам покажем да сам добар диктатор.
- Posts : 13817
Join date : 2016-02-01
- Post n°70
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2021/01/09/the-woke-purge/The woke purge
Twitter’s suspension of Donald Trump is a chilling sign of tyranny to come.
Brendan O'Neill, Editor
9th January 2021
Cancel culture doesn’t exist, they say. And yet with the flick of a switch, billionaire capitalists voted for by precisely nobody have just silenced a man who is still the democratically elected president of the United States. With the push of a button in their vast temples to technology, the new capitalist oligarchs of Silicon Valley have prevented a man who won the second largest vote in the history of the American republic just two months ago — 74million votes — from engaging with his supporters (and critics) in the new public square of the internet age.
Not only does cancel culture exist — it is the means through which the powerful, unaccountable oligarchies of the internet era and their clueless cheerleaders in the liberal elites interfere in the democratic process and purge voices they disapprove of. That’s what Twitter’s permanent suspension of Donald Trump confirms.
The new capitalists’ cancellation of the democratically elected president of the United States is a very significant turning point in the politics and culture of the Western world. We underestimate the significance of this act of unilateral purging at our peril. It demonstrates that the greatest threat to freedom and democracy comes not from the oafs and hard-right clowns who stormed the Capitol this week, but from the technocratic elites who spy in the breaching of the Capitol an opportunity to consolidate their cultural power and their political dominance.
Twitter’s ban on Trump is extraordinary for many reasons. First, there’s the arrogance of it. Make no mistake: this is the bosses vs democracy; corporates vs the people; exceptionally wealthy and aloof elites determining which elected politicians may engage in online discussion, which is where most political and public debate takes place in the 21st century. Those who cannot see how concerning and sinister it is that a handful of Big Tech companies have secured a virtual monopoly over the social side of the internet, and are now exploiting their monopolistic power to dictate what political opinions it is acceptable to hold and express in these forums, urgently needs a wake-up call.
Secondly, there is Twitter’s deeply disturbing justification for why it suspended Trump. It says Trump’s account ran the ‘risk’ of ‘inciting violence’. And yet the two tweets of his that it cites do nothing of the sort. In one, Trump describes his voters as ‘great American patriots’ and insists they will have a ‘GIANT VOICE’ in the future. In the other he confirms that he will not be attending the inauguration of Joe Biden. That’s it. In what warped moral universe can such standard, boastful Trump-made statements be interpreted as calls for violence?
In the warped moral universe of pre-emptive, precautionary censorship being built by our tech overlords, that’s where. Strikingly, Twitter says its censorship of the president is based on how other people might read and interpret his words. It says its censorious motivation is ‘specifically’ the question of ‘how [Trump’s tweets] are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter’. Trump’s comments ‘must be read’ in the broader context of how certain statements ‘can be mobilised by different audiences’, Twitter decrees. So Trump’s words, strictly speaking, are not the problem; it’s the possibility, the risk, that someone, somewhere might interpret them in a particular way.
This sets a terrifying precedent for the internet age. It legitimises a new regime of online censorship which doesn’t only punish inflammatory speech — which would be bad enough — but which punishes normal, legitimate political speech on the grounds of how other, unnamed people or groups might respond to it.
There would be no end to what could be censored. Trans-sceptical feminists, already victims of Silicon Valley’s woke purges, would be completely wiped out on the basis that some idiot might interpret their intellectual, non-bigoted critiques of genderfluidity as an instruction to bash a trans person. Christians sceptical of gay marriage, pro-life campaigners furious about abortion, radical leftists who say ‘smash the system’ — all could potentially fall foul of this new diktat that says we are not only responsible for what we ourselves think and say, but also for the myriad interpretations that everyone else, from the man in the street to the weirdo incel, makes of what we think and say.
On this basis the White Album should be banned, given its songs ‘Helter Skelter’ and ‘Piggies’ were ‘mobilised by different audiences’ to terrible ends — the killings carried out by Charles Manson’s Family. Catcher in the Rye? Censor it. Don’t you remember how it ‘mobilised’ Mark David Chapman to kill John Lennon? As for the Bible, the Koran and any number of political texts and anthems — the risks of ‘mobilisation’ that they pose are clearly too great, so, to be on the safe side, let’s scrub those too.
It isn’t just Twitter. Mark Zuckerberg (zero votes) had already indefinitely suspended Trump (74million votes) from Facebook. Reddit has scrubbed its Donald Trump thread. All social-media accounts that promote the mad Qanon conspiracy theory are being suspended. Mike Flynn and Sidney Powell have been banished from Twitter. YouTube is now banning any video and account that says the American election was fraudulent. This shows how ideological Silicon Valley oligarchs have become. For four years leading members of the media and cultural elites in the US and the UK have said the American presidential election and the EU referendum of 2016 were frauds. That they were meddled with, illegitimate, should be overthrown. You’ll find tens of thousands of videos on YouTube featuring people saying the vote for Brexit was a fit-up by Ruskies or an ‘advisory’ vote fraudulently turned into an instructional one. They won’t be taken down. Because our tech overlords are engaged in acts of openly political censorship.
And then there’s Parler, the libertarian alternative to Twitter. Google this week removed the Parler app from its store on the basis that it doesn’t control its users’ inflammatory speech strictly enough. Apple is threatening to do likewise. All those who said ‘Just make your own social-media platform’ clearly underestimated the tyrannical determination of the woke elites to erase ‘offensive speech’ from every quarter of the internet. This is a full-on purge of any voice that significantly runs counter to the worldview of the anti-populist elites.
That the left is cheering this on is cretinism of the most remarkable kind. They are green-lighting the most thorough assault on freedom of speech that the capitalist elites have ever carried out. They are sanctioning the control of speech by billionaires. They are celebrating as corporate oligarchies interfere directly in the democratic process. They are making a fetish of private property rights, insisting that the corporate rights of virtual monopolies like Twitter and Facebook, in this case their right to throw people off their platforms, override the social, democratic good of free public debate.
I know this is unlikely anytime soon — given the entirely bullshit and pseudo ‘leftish’ posturing of the Silicon Valley elites — but imagine if at some point in the future the tech overlords decide that Bernie Sanders or some rabble-rousing organiser of protests outside Google’s HQ might ‘mobilise audiences’ to do something bad and decide to ban them? What will the left say? Nothing, presumably. Or nothing that should be taken seriously, given they will have helped to create this web of tyranny. They have forgotten the cry of the true radical Thomas Paine: ‘He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.’
There is danger in the current moment. It comes not from horn-helmeted idiots and racist scumbags who paraded through the Capitol Building for an hour, but from those who wish to turn that despicable incident into the founding myth of a new era of woke authoritarianism. The business and political elites, determined to crush the populist experiment of recent years, will busily launch wars on ‘domestic terrorism’, clamp down on inflammatory speech, purge from the internet and from workplaces anyone with ‘incorrect’ thoughts, and blacklist those who believe populism is preferable to technocracy. They’re already doing it. The Biden administration isn’t even in power yet and this is already happening. Imagine how emboldened the new oligarchies and their woke mobs will become once Biden and Co are ruling. Brace yourselves; the purge is only beginning.
Brendan O’Neill is editor of spiked and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy
- Posts : 82754
Join date : 2012-06-10
- Post n°72
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Ma Brendan O'Nil, of spiked! fame - naravno da nije u pravu
_____
"Oni kroz mene gledaju u vas! Oni kroz njega gledaju u vas! Oni kroz vas gledaju u mene... i u sve nas."
Dragoslav Bokan, Novi putevi oftalmologije
- Posts : 11141
Join date : 2014-10-28
Age : 45
- Post n°73
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Nije ni bitno da li jeste ili nije
Reko mu biden u debati stfu
I nema ga vise na internetu
Reko mu biden u debati stfu
I nema ga vise na internetu
_____
radikalni patrijarhalni feminista
smrk kod dijane hrk
- Posts : 11141
Join date : 2014-10-28
Age : 45
- Post n°74
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
Sutra ce fazon da napadnu burundi
_____
radikalni patrijarhalni feminista
smrk kod dijane hrk
- Posts : 7775
Join date : 2017-03-14
- Post n°75
Re: Američki izbori 2020.
kada su došli po Trampa ja sam ćutao...