Home
by Erős Pista Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:25 amAZ-5 wrote:William Murderface wrote:1917 - lose. Uvredljivo lose.
zapad se prosro da je to idi i smotri iz ww1, ne znam gde je to vido, idi je odlican film.
Besmislica. Idi i smotri je remek-delo antiratnog filma.
1917 zapravo nije antiratni, već ratno-fetišistički i odvratno "patriotski" progandni film. Nije ni Denkerk daleko, ali on je bar o WWII, a ovo je potpuni užas.
https://louisproyect.org/2020/01/12/1917/Unlike WWII, films about WWI tend to be bitter antiwar commentaries. This includes the 1930 “All Quiet on the Western Front, the 1937 “The Grand Illusion,” one of the greatest films ever made, and Stanley Kubrick’s 1957 “Paths of Glory.” Since WWI was such an obviously imperialist affair, it would be difficult to represent it as a heroic defense of freedom—even if the propaganda surrounding the war tended to make the “Huns” a demonic force.
Since, as Alexander Pope put it, fools rush in where angels fear to tread, it was no surprise that Sam Mendes would make a film titled “1917” that, while not nearly an attempt to turn the two British soldiers it features into freedom-fighters, does make their efforts to warn off their comrades from a surprise German trap look like a noble sacrifice.
