Novak - četnik sa reketom

Cousin Billy wrote:12:22 Novi sudija ima strogu, špicastu facu. Loš znak

Justice David O’Callaghan has raised the possibility of Djokovic’s hearing tomorrow coming before the full bench of the Federal Court, rather than being heard by a single judge.
“A full court can be convened commencing tomorrow morning,” the judge said.

Cousin Billy wrote:12:30 Aaaa ovo je proceduralno ročište, ne odlučuje se ništa ovde osim prenosa na federalni nivo. Ceo lajv blog bio je redundantan a vaš izveštač je debil.

Mór Thököly wrote:9 puta, 9 puta je osvojio AO. Da je neko iz Francuske, Amerike ili cak Spanije zvali bi ga one of their one. Ovako je opasnost za javni red i 87% se slaze s tim. Cak posto je njihov sud jednom odbacio ponistavanje vize. Pa LOL.

dobro, za bas Francusku je pitanje u bas ovom trenutku ali poenta stoji

Djokovic’s lawyers will have submitted all their submissions by midday today, with lawyers for the Immigration Minister to respond and serve theirs by 10pm tonight.
Paul Holdenson QC, appearing on behalf of Djokovic, said his client had no problem with his affadavit being released to the public today.

All parties agreed to the hearing going ahead tomorrow at 9.30am (Australian Eastern Daylight Time) [= 23.30 CET].
The hearing was fairly administrative, with the only dispute between the parties being whether Mr Novak’s case is heard by a single judge of the court tomorrow, or the full court of three judges.
If the case is heard by the full court, the Minister Mr Hawke will have no avenue to appeal any decision made.
Justice David O’Callaghan has advised he will make a decision on that matter today.

Prijateljica, Britanka, koja zivi u Melburnu mi kaze upravo da nikada nije videla da se o nekome ovako lose pise kao o Novaku i da ga tamo obicni ljudi bukvalno preziru. Kaze da vlada bas nista drugo nije mogla da uradi, jer su ljudi jako, jako besni.

— MacJelena (@JeljefJelena) January 14, 2022

Kaze mi zena da misli da ce neko da ga napadne ako ostane, tako su ogorceni.

— MacJelena (@JeljefJelena) January 14, 2022

Nisam pitala. Ona zena nema neka snazna osecanja al'kaze da je bas grozna hajka na njega.

— MacJelena (@JeljefJelena) January 14, 2022

Besni su na svoju Vladu a Novaka ne zele u zemlji.

— MacJelena (@JeljefJelena) January 14, 2022

And we're underway. While Judge O'Callaghan is sitting in court in person everyone else is online from remote location and he's made the formal order confirming that can happen. He's also reminding everyone it's illegal to record or screenshot the hearing.
He says the purpose of the hearing is to deal with confirming Judge Kelly's order transferring the case from the Federal Circuit Court to the higher Federal Court. Secondly is to deal with procedural isues.
Thirdly, he says the Chief Justice has asked him to find out from them if they think the proper jurisdiction is a single judge, or a full court. Justice O'Callaghan says a full bench could be convened tomorrow.
Paul Holdenson QC is speaking for Novak Djokovic today. He's appearing with Nick Wood SC again. He says he would like a few minute to consider a full court decision.
He says the other procedural matters are confirming Djokovic's application be filed an served by midday today, and the government's reponse by 10pm. There's also to be a decision on time limits for the hearing. Yesterday 60 minutes was suggested.
Mr Holdenson said there's an affidavit in support of the application being prepared. Ordinarily that wouldn't be made publily available unti lit's been "read" by the court - essentilly not before tomorrow's hearing. But he's not opposed to it being made public today.
Djokovic's lawyers are keen for a full court.
Holdenson: "I think three judges is appropriate. That matter can be dealt with, in our submission, by a full court."
Stephen Lloyd says the government is opposed to a full court referral and there's no justification for it.
"In the normal course, any party has a right of appeal. Having the matter referred to the full court would remove any party's right to appeal."
Just quickly - a decision of a single judge in the Federal Court can be appealed to a full bench of three judges. Djokovic's lawyers support skipping straight to the three judges, the government is against it.
Justice O'Callaghan says the parties will be notified later this morning whether it'll be one judge or three.
He's confirming the schedule now. The hearing will begin at 9.30am AEDT tomorrow, Sunday January 16.

kapetanm wrote:Jedino po meni moze da se povadi ako se okrene, ode kuci i posalje im u paketu svih 9 pehara odričući se tih titula. Tako je Kasijus Klej postao najveći

Notxor wrote:

pic.twitter.com/MbDB9vzcmA

— Stevanović Vladimir (@VladimirStev) January 14, 2022

Talason wrote:da ne budem lenj, nauka ima smisla ako pratiš dokaze gde god da te odvedu

sa omikoronom je značaj vakcine prvenstveno zaštita pojedinca

prema radovima koje sam video, imunitet stečen virusom je nešto efikasniji od imuniteta stečenog mrna koja prenosi informacije bivšeg spajk proteina

na osnovu toga možemo da smatramo da je osoba koja je imala covid imunizovana bar koliko i vakcinisana osoba

meni je bilo draže da se vakcinišem zato što sumnjam u pušačka pluća koje imam i zato što sam želeo da smanjim još neke verovatnoće

za ovog čija je tema, verujem da ima dovoljno argumenata da ga boli kurac za vakcinu, ako je tačno da je bio dva puta zaražen i da ne predstavlja nikakav rizik za druge, bar ne veći od bilo kog ko je vakcinisan

ovo nema veze sa zdravljem ni sa vakcinama

da ima veze, ne bi imali ovaj broj slučajeva koji imaju

kapetanm wrote:Jedino po meni moze da se povadi ako se okrene, ode kuci i posalje im u paketu svih 9 pehara odričući se tih titula. Tako je Kasijus Klej postao najveći