Sirija, početak regionalnog rata

U.S. is in Syria for the long haul, says Michael Mulroy, Dep Ass Sec for Def. The US is “not in a bad situation” in Syria, Mulroy said, the country has “ a very capable partner,” & the territory contains “a lot of the oil resources & arable land.”  https://t.co/X4ajRef49t

— Joshua Landis (@joshua_landis) April 30, 2019

The United States was “not in a bad situation” in Syria, Mulroy said, adding that the country has “ a very capable partner,” referring to the predominantly-Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF.)

& the territory contains “a lot of the oil resources & arable land.”  

Filipenko wrote:

& the territory contains “a lot of the oil resources & arable land.”  

Ovaj deo si propustio, ili ga ne podrzavas, posto za tebe postoji samo prvi deo recenice?

Filipenko wrote:Pa jebem li ga, meni tako kad kvotujes - a deluje mi da to radis cesto u poslednje vreme. Kao da npr. ja kvotujem "Videvši da je teritorijama Ukrajine i južne Rusije zavladala glad, sovjetsko rukovodstvo je predzelo mere" i to podržim sa  , a izostavim ostatak rečenice "...da silom pokupi i ostatak žita i strelja neposlušne." što, priznaćeš, unekoliko menja kontekst.

Ointagru Unartan wrote:Sirija je  nekada proizvodila oko 380 000 barila nafte dnevno, trenutno se na podrucju pod kontrolom vlade proizvodi oko 24 000 barila (domaca potraznja je 120 000 barila, sto znaci da se nafta mora uvoziti, uvoze je od 2012, iz Irana). Kurdi proizvode jos toliko, s tim da deo po dogovoru vracaju Asadu. Jasno je da je  SAD-u, sa proizvodnjom od tricavih 12 miliona barila nafte dnevno, strateski interes da se dokopa tih nekoliko naftnih polja u Siriji.

Creepy Uncle wrote:u Srbiji je o tome nemoguce razgovarati. postoji ideja da se apsolutno sve na svetu desava zbog energenata i svi razgovori se svedu na to. ja digao ruke pre vise godina.

KinderLad wrote:Ja sam samo napomenuo da niko normalan ne veruje da je altruizam u pitanju. Interesi nekakvi su sigurno. Samo ne vidim u cemu je tu skandal. Plus, (ali samo plus, ne glavni razlog) oni su im od svih koji su tamo verovatno ipak i najsimpaticniji. Verovatno. Po sistemu oni su pravili najmanje raznih gluposti. Pravili su ih, ali manje od drugih.

Zuper wrote:Nije to rekao niko iz Srbije vec predstavnik administracije iz Vosingtona.

Filipenko wrote:

Creepy Uncle wrote:u Srbiji je o tome nemoguce razgovarati. postoji ideja da se apsolutno sve na svetu desava zbog energenata i svi razgovori se svedu na to. ja digao ruke pre vise godina.

Osim sto je rekao covek iz Vasingtona, a ne mi, cinicni Srbi. Osim toga, nije kao da se glavne stvari na svetu ne desavaju zbog energenata. Posebno kada se stvari posmatraju tako da se ukljuce uranijum, ugalj i slicne stvarcice, pa i - kao sto rece opet taj iz Vasingtona - obradiva zemlja. Ulazimo u doba ratova za resurse u plemenskom smislu te reci, napravili smo full circle, tek ce da bude picvajza sirom sveta.

WE HAVE A CAPABLE PARTNER, THEY HAVE THE TERRITORY THAT CONTROLS A LOT OF THE OIL RESOURCES, AND WE ARE THERE WITH THEM. AND WE ARE -- WE DO EXPECT TO BE THERE FOR THE LONG HAUL. AND OUR PRESENCE, ALTHOUGH MILITARY PRESENCE IS ONLY THERE TO ENSURE THE ENDURING DEFEAT OF ISIS, IT DOES PROVIDE OUR DIPLOMATS INFLUENCE. WHEN THEY -- WE HAVE SEVERAL OBJECTIVES IN SYRIA, ONLY ONE OF THEM IS TO DEFEAT ISIS, WHEN IT COMES TO PUSHING FOR THE U.N. RESOLUTION 2254, PROT SES TO GO FORWARD, WHICH AMBASSADOR JEFFREY IS THERE AT THE HELM, HAVING US THERE IN THE NORTHEAST DOES PROVIDE LEVERAGE. WHEN IT COMES TO PUSHING BACK AGAINST THE IRANIAN CONTROLLED MILITIAS THAT ARE IN SYRIA THAT REALLY HAVE A THREAT TO A LOT OF OUR ALLIES, OUR PRESENCE IS NOT THERE FOR THAT, BUT OUR PRESENCE DOES ALLOW US A LOT OF INFLUENCE WHEN IT COMES TO DEALING WITH CONSEQUENCES.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?460180-2/syria-middle-east-security-michael-mulroy-remarks